The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretationAmes, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Religion
The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretation
Ames, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Bible. Revelation -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The proof of this somewhat novel interpretation of the two witnesses,
if, indeed, any interpretation of any part of the Apocalypse can be
called novel, lies in the fact that it explains all the details of the
vision which are presented to us simply, easily, and without any forced
construction. It is essential to group together the separate details,
and then endeavor to explain them.
The seer says of these two witnesses that they prophesy in sackcloth
twelve hundred and sixty days, which, as has been said in discussing
rules of interpretation, is one of the numbers symbolical of Judaism;
they are identified as corresponding with the “two sons of oil, that
stand by the Lord of the whole earth,” of whom Zechariah wrote (Revised
Version); they have power to devour their enemies and shut heaven
by the miracles of withholding the rain, turning waters to blood,
and smiting the earth with plagues. There is a period when their
“testimony” is finished. When that period is reached their enemy, the
beast from the bottomless pit, kills them, and their dead bodies lie
exposed for three and a half days “in the street of the great city,
which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was
crucified.” At the end of this period “the Spirit of life entered into
them, and they stood upon their feet;” and they finally “ascended up to
heaven” amid convulsions which shake the earth and fill men with terror.
How accurately all these features of the paragraph find their
fulfillment in the law and the prophets, or the Old Testament
Scriptures, may be readily shown:
_First._ It is worthy of consideration as a strong point that the
expression, “the law and the prophets” (sometimes “Moses and the
prophets”), is the one almost invariably employed by our Lord in
designating the older Scriptures (Matthew v, 17; vii, 12; xi, 13;
xxii, 40; Luke xvi, 31; xxiv, 27; as also John i, 45; Acts xiii, 15;
xxviii, 23).
_Secondly._ The testimony of the prophets and writers of the Old
Testament may be truly said to have been given in sackcloth. What one
of these messengers of God ever met with a cordial reception? Well
did Stephen say, perhaps in the hearing of John himself, “Which of the
prophets have not your fathers persecuted?” “They were stoned, were
sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered
about in sheepskins, and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted,
tormented” (Hebrews xi, 37; Luke xi, 49‒51).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account