Utopias -- Fiction; Women -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Fiction
Then there was silence for a little, the Professor calmly eating an egg,
and the Home Secretary playing with her tea-spoon.
'We hardly expected success,' she continued, after a while; 'it was only
in the desperate condition of the Party that the Cabinet gave way to my
proposal. Yet I did hope that the nature of the Bill would have awakened
the sympathy of a House which has brothers, fathers, nephews, and male
relations of all kinds, and does not consist entirely of orphaned only
daughters.'
'That is bitter, Constance,' sighed the Professor. 'I hope you did not
begin by saying so.'
'No, I did not. I explained that we were about to ask for a Commission
into the general condition of the men of this country. I set forth, in
mild and conciliating language, a few of my facts. You know them all; I
learned them from you. I showed that the whole of the educational
endowments of this country have been seized upon for the advantage of
women. I suggested that a small proportion might be diverted for the
assistance of men. Married men with property, I showed, have no
protection from the prodigality of their wives. I pointed out that the
law of evidence, as regards violence towards wives, presses heavily on
the man. I showed that single men's wages are barely sufficient to
purchase necessary clothing. I complained of the long hours during which
men have to toil in solitude or in silence, of the many cases in which
they have to do housework and attend to the babies, as well as do their
long day's work. And I ventured to hint at the onerous nature of the
Married Mother's Tax--that five per cent. on all men's earnings.'
'My dear Constance,' interrupted the Professor, 'was it judicious to
show your whole hand at once? Surely step by step would have been
safer.'
'Perhaps. I ventured next to call the serious attention of the House to
the grave discontent among the younger women of the middle classes who,
by reason of the crowded state of the professions, are unable to think
of marriage, as a rule, before forty, and often have to wait later. This
was received with cold disapprobation: the House is always touchy on the
subject of marriage. But when I went on to hint that there was danger
to the State in the reluctance with which the young men entered the
married state under these conditions, there was such a clamour that I
sat down.'
The Professor nodded.
'Just what one would have expected. Talk the conventional commonplace,
and the House will listen; tell the truth, and the House will rise with
one consent and shriek you down. Poor child! what did you expect?'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account