The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
So far, then, the German national movement had, on the whole, been
guided wisely and moderately; but when the discussions began about the
basis of the election of the future Assembly there quickly appeared
that German national arrogance which was destined to inflame to so
intolerable an extent the antagonism of feeling between the rival
races in Bohemia. It was, indeed, unavoidable that the German movement
in Austria should be met by some expression of friendliness and some
attempt at common action on the part of the Frankfort Parliament; but
the desire to welcome all Germans into the bosom of the newly-united
Germany became at once complicated with the question of the best
way of dealing with those districts where Slavs and Germans were
so closely mixed together. This question, indeed, would in all
probability have been summarily answered by the German Parliament in
favour of absolute German supremacy and of the absorption of Bohemia
in Germany; but the Slavonic question in the South could not be
considered apart from that other phase of it, which was concerned with
the mutual relation between Poles and Germans in the Polish districts
of the Kingdom of Prussia. Even the most extreme champions of German
supremacy were influenced in their decision of this _North_ Slavonic
question by their desire to restore an independent Poland as a bulwark
against Russian oppression; and they could not deny that the claims of
the Poles to the possession of Posen, at any rate, were as justifiable
morally and historically as their claims to that part of their country
which had been absorbed by Russia. They were desirous, therefore, of
making concessions to Slavonic feeling in Posen; and this desire was
increased by the connection which Mieroslawsky had established between
the struggle for Polish freedom in Posen and that for German freedom
in other parts of Prussia. Under these circumstances they could not
wholly disregard in Bohemia the feeling which they humoured in Posen;
and thus it came to pass that the Preparatory Parliament, unwilling
either to abandon German supremacy or to violate directly the
principle of unity and autonomy of race, came to the conclusion so
common to men under similar difficulties, to throw the burden of the
decision on others. They therefore passed a vague resolution which
might be differently interpreted by different readers, while they left
the practical decision of the question to the Committee of Fifty
which was to govern Germany from the dissolution of the Preparatory
Parliament on April 4 till the meeting of the Constituent Assembly on
May 8.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account