The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
was taken up by the students; Pillersdorf advised the Emperor to
yield, and on May 16 Ferdinand issued a proclamation granting a one
Chamber Constitution. But whether the shock had been too much for his
feeble health, and had struck him with a panic, or whether he yielded
to the advice of his courtiers, Ferdinand suddenly resolved to leave
Vienna, and on May 17 he fled secretly to Innspruck.
These events produced a somewhat peculiar effect on opinion in various
parts of the Empire. In Bohemia the extreme national feeling had been
hitherto represented by the Swornost, a body corresponding almost
exactly to the Students' Legion in Vienna; and they had been held
somewhat in check by the noblemen and citizens, who had organized the
March movement. But the Vienna rising of May 15, and the flight of the
Emperor, roused the indignation of men like Count Thun and Count Deym;
and they decided to take the important step of breaking loose
altogether from the Viennese Ministry, summoning a special Bohemian
assembly in June, and inviting the Emperor to take refuge in Prague.
The Swornost, on their part, felt some reluctance to take any steps
which seemed to condemn the abolition of the Upper Chamber by the
Viennese; but the bitter hostility, which the Germans of Vienna had so
repeatedly shown against the Bohemians during the months of April and
May, prevented the possibility of any understanding between the
Democrats of Prague and those of Vienna; and thus the students of
Prague were ready to approve, not only the assertion of Bohemian
independence, but even the proposed deputation to the Emperor.
Kossuth, on his part, saw in these events an opportunity for
increasing the growing friendliness between the Magyars and the
Emperor; and he induced the Hungarian Ministry to invite Ferdinand to
Pesth. This attitude of the Magyar leaders was due to one or two
causes. In the first place the Viennese, as mentioned above, had been
growing alarmed at the separate position granted to Hungary, and had
feared that they would lose their hold over that kingdom altogether.
This naturally produced an attitude of hostility on their part, which
provoked a counter-feeling of antagonism in the Magyars; and thus the
latter became more friendly to Ferdinand as the representative of the
anti-democratic principle, and therefore the opponent of the ruling
spirits of Vienna. There was also a second reason of a stranger kind,
which placed the leaders of the Magyar movement in hostility to the
Democratic party in Vienna. In spite of the strong German feeling
which prevailed among the leading Democrats of Vienna, it was the
opinion of some of those Hungarians who were best acquainted with that
city, that the change from indirect to direct elections, which was one
of the results of the May rising, would tend to increase the power of
the large Slavonic population of Vienna.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account