The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three YearsMaurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
History
The Revolutionary Movement of 1848-9 in Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany: With Some Examination of the Previous Thirty-three Years
Maurice, C. Edmund (Charles Edmund)
Europe -- History -- 1848-1849; Revolutions -- Europe
But the great cause of the growing sympathy between the Magyars and
the Emperor was the attitude taken up by the latter in the questions
at issue between Hungary and Croatia. Although the appointment of
Jellaciç, as Ban of Croatia, had been considered as an undue exertion
of the power of the Court to the disadvantage of the Magyars, yet the
independent tone which Jellaciç had adopted since his appointment,
seemed to alarm the Emperor as much as it did Batthyanyi or Kossuth.
Immediately after his appointment, Jellaciç announced that "the
Revolution has changed our relations to our old ally, Hungary"; and
that "we must take care that the new relation shall be consistent with
independence and equality"; and he had then proceeded to summon the
Assembly of Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia to meet at Agram in June.
This independent attitude had brought rebukes upon Jellaciç from
Ferdinand and the Hungarian Ministry alike; and the Croatian Council,
while appealing to the Emperor to strengthen the hands of the Ban, had
threatened that, if pressed too hard by the Magyars, they would take
measures to defend themselves. It was not unnatural, therefore, that
at this moment the Croats should be more disposed to sympathise with
the Democrats of Vienna; and that Kossuth should try to draw closer
the bond between the Emperor and the Magyars.
It might indeed seem that the appeal of the Bohemians to the Emperor
under these circumstances would have brought them out of sympathy with
the Slavs of Croatia and Slavonia; but not only did the Emperor refuse
to go to Prague, but the Tyrolese followed up that refusal by a sharp
rebuke to the Bohemians for their proposal of a Slavonic Congress in
Prague. Though, however, the Slavs of Hungary looked forward to the
Slavonic Congress, and were willing to accept Prague as the centre of
their political deliberations, it was in the Hungarian provinces
themselves that the most vigorous action in defence of their rights
was at present to be found. For while the Croatian Council were
protesting against the Emperor's rebuke to Jellaciç, the Serbs were
gathering for their Conference of May 13 in Carlowitz, and resolving
to send deputies to the Croatian Assembly, and to the Emperor himself,
and also to choose representatives for the Prague Congress. Crnojeviç,
who had been sent by the Magyars to enforce martial law on the Serbs
of the Banat and Bacska, after the riot at Kikinda, denounced the
meeting, and called on Rajaciç to prevent it. Rajaciç would have
hesitated about further action, but Stratimiroviç and his more fiery
friends answered the threat by burning Crnojeviç's letter publicly;
and the meeting took place in defiance of his warning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account