The Right Honourable Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe P.C., D.C.L., F.R.S.: A Biographical SketchThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Science
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe P.C., D.C.L., F.R.S.: A Biographical Sketch
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Roscoe, Henry E. (Henry Enfield), 1833-1915
It is perhaps idle to speculate why Roscoe should have left Williamson at
the most fruitful period of his career, and when, under his stimulus,
organic chemistry was apparently about to enter upon a great development
in this country. But the probability is that then, as afterwards, the
problems of organic chemistry and the purely speculative aspects of the
science had few attractions for him, and that he saw in the many-sided
nature of Bunsen’s work, in its eminently practical character, and
the precision of its quantitative methods, much that appealed to his
inclination towards the operative, and especially the determinative side
of chemistry, for Bunsen was pre-eminently a master of manipulation, as
every one who aspired to a professional career in chemistry and who hoped
to direct a chemical laboratory fully recognized.
Roscoe, with his mother and sister, who elected to keep house for him,
reached Heidelberg in the autumn of 1853 with an introduction to von
Mohl, the Professor of International Law, with whose family they became
well acquainted. One of the daughters, Anna von Mohl, was the second wife
of Helmholtz. By von Mohl he was made known to Bunsen.
I shall never forget (says Roscoe in his Autobiography) my
first sight of him—the man who afterwards became one of my
dearest friends, and to whom I owe more than I can tell.… He
was then at the height of his mental and physical powers. He
stood fully six feet high, his manner was simple yet dignified,
and his expression one of rare intelligence and great kindness.
This first impression of his bearing and character only became
stronger as my knowledge of him increased, and the feelings
of respect and affection with which I regarded him were those
of all with whom he came in contact. His singular amiability
was not a sign of weakness, but of strength of character. His
modesty was natural and in no degree assumed. In his lectures,
when giving an account of some discovery he had made, or some
new apparatus or method of work which he had investigated, I
never heard him mention himself. It was always “man hat dies
gefunden,” or “es hat sich so herausgestellt.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account