Mr. Salomon then argued that the State would have to prove that the object of the Haymarket meeting was to "aggressively kill the police." He pointed out that the defendants had consecrated their lives to the benefit of their fellow men. They did not seek McCormick's property for themselves--they did not want the goods in Marshall Field's store for themselves. Their methods were dangerous, but why were they not stopped at inception? They advocated force, because they believed in force. No twelve men--no 12,000 men--could root out Anarchy. Anarchy is of the head--it is implanted in the soul! As well attempt to root out Republicanism or Democracy! They intended revolution--a revolution similar to that of the Northern states against slavery, or of America against British oppression. They wanted to free the white slaves--the working classes. They intended to use dynamite in furtherance of that revolution. But they did not expect, nor did they conspire to take, the life of officer Degan. Lingg had the right to manufacture bombs and fill his house with dynamite, if he so pleased. There was no law against it. Mr. Salomon intimated that an attempt would be made to show who threw the bomb, or that it was thrown by somebody other than Schnaubelt; also that the police began the riot by shooting into the crowd; that Schwab was not at the meeting at all, and that when the bomb exploded Parsons and Fischer were in Zephf's hall drinking beer. "We expect further to show you," said Mr. Salomon, "that this meeting had assembled peaceably, that its objects were peaceable, that they delivered the same harangues, that the crowd listened quietly, that not a single act transpired there previous to the coming of the police, for which any man in it could be held amenable to law. They assembled there under the provisions of our Constitution in the exercise of their right of free speech, to discuss the situation of the working men, to discuss the eight-hour question. They assembled there and incidentally discussed what they called the outrages perpetrated at McCormick's. No man expected that bomb would be thrown, no man expected that any one would be injured at that meeting." The witness who gave, perhaps, the strongest evidence for the defense was Dr. James D. Taylor, an aged physician of the Eclectic school. On the direct examination, Captain Black asked: "How old are you?" Answer--"I am seventy-six years of age." "Where were you on May 4, in the evening?"--"At the Haymarket." "Tell us when you reached the Haymarket."--"About twenty minutes before the speaking commenced." "During that twenty minutes where were you?"--"I was standing in the alley--Crane's alley--near Desplaines street." "How near to the west edge of the sidewalk?"--"Very close to it." "How long did you occupy that position?"--"As long as the bullets would let me." "How long was that?" asks Mr. Grinnell.--"I was the last man that left the alley after the bomb exploded."