The Rise and Fall of NauvooRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
History
The Rise and Fall of Nauvoo
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saints -- Illinois -- Nauvoo; Nauvoo (Ill.) -- History
Occasionally the Prophet expounded the Scriptures, and in this he
was most happy: not so much on account of his knowledge of ancient
languages--though that knowledge, when his opportunities for acquiring
it are taken into account, was surprisingly extensive--as from that
divine inspiration which so mightily rested upon him at times. Of the
Bible itself the Prophet said:
I believe the Bible as it read when it came from the pen of the
original writers. Ignorant translators, careless transcribers, or
designing and corrupt priests have committed many errors.
As an example of the errors which had crept into the holy record he put
in contrast the following:
It repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth.--Genesis v:
6.
God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man that
he should repent.--Numbers xxiii: 19.
His exegesis, which at once harmonizes the conflicting passages, and
satisfies the understanding, is as follows:
It ought to read: It repented _Noah_ that God had made man. This I
believe, and then the other quotation [meaning the second] stands
fair. If any man will prove to me by one passage of holy writ one
item I believe to be false, I will renounce and disclaim it as far
as I have promulgated it.
In like manner he set the following passage right, Hebrews VI: 1-6.
The first principles of the Gospel, as I believe, are, _Faith,
Repentance, Baptism_ for the remission of sins, with the promise
of the _Holy Ghost_. Look at Hebrews VI: 1, for contradictions!
"Therefore _leaving_ the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let
us go on unto perfection." If a man _leaves_ the principles of the
doctrine of Christ, how can he be saved in the principles? This is
a contradiction. * * * I will render it as it should be: "Therefore
_not_ leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go
on unto perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance
from dead works, and of faith towards God," etc.
In like manner he pointed out a solecism in the Lord's prayer. It reads
in our common version:
_Lead_ us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil, for thine
is the kingdom, the power, etc.
In contrast with this may be placed the statement of James:
Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God
cannot be tempted with evil, _neither tempteth he any man_.--James
1: 13.
Then why pray to God the Father--
And lead us not into temptation?
The Prophet's exegesis was:
The passage should read: And _leave_ us not--or, suffer us not to
be led, into temptation, for thine is the kingdom, etc.
Again, in a public discourse he dealt with the following passage:
Among those that are born of women, there hath not arisen a greater
prophet than John the Baptist: nevertheless, he that is _least_ in
the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account