The Rise and Fall of NauvooRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
History
The Rise and Fall of Nauvoo
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saints -- Illinois -- Nauvoo; Nauvoo (Ill.) -- History
Taking up the first part of the question, viz: the greatness of John,
he thus expounded it:
Firstly, he [John] was trusted with a divine mission of preparing
the way before the face of the Lord. Whoever had such a trust
committed to him before or since? No man. Secondly, he was
intrusted with the important mission, and it was required at his
hands to baptize the Son of Man. Whoever had the honor of doing
that? Whoever had so great a privilege and glory? Whoever led the
Son of God into the waters of baptism, and had the privilege of
beholding the Holy Ghost descend in the form of a dove, or rather
in the sign of a dove, in witness of that administration? * * *
Thirdly, John at that time was the only legal administrator in the
affairs of the kingdom there was then on earth and holding the
keys of power. The Jews had to obey his instructions or be damned
by their own laws, and Christ Himself fulfilled all righteousness
in becoming obedient to the law which He had given to Moses on the
mount, and thereby magnified it and made it honorable, instead of
destroying it. The son of Zachariah wrested the keys, the kingdom,
the power, the glory, from the Jews, by the holy anointing and
decree of heaven; and these three reasons constitute him the
greatest Prophet born of women.
Taking up the second part of the subject--"He that is least in the
kingdom of heaven is greater than he," [i. e., greater than John]--it
was made easy to understand in the following manner:
How was the least in the kingdom of heaven greater than he [John]?
In reply, I ask who did Jesus have reference to as being the least?
Jesus was looked upon as having the _least_ claim in all God's
kingdom, and was _least_ entitled to their credulity as a Prophet,
as though he had said: "He that is _considered_ the least among
you, is greater than John--that is myself."
Explaining the matter of interpretation itself, he said:
What is the rule of interpretation? Just no interpretation at
all. Understand it precisely as it reads. I have a key by which I
understand the Scriptures. I inquire, what was the question which
drew out the answer or caused Jesus to utter the parable? * * * To
ascertain its meaning, we must dig to the root and ascertain what
it was that drew the saying out of Jesus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account