The Rise and Fall of NauvooRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
History
The Rise and Fall of Nauvoo
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Latter Day Saints -- Illinois -- Nauvoo; Nauvoo (Ill.) -- History
The incident, however, suggested to the Prophet the propriety of
addressing letters to each of the candidates for the presidency--five
in number, viz.,--John C. Calhoun, Lewis Cass, Richard M. Johnson,
Henry Clay and Martin Van Buren--to ascertain what policy they would
adopt respecting the Saints and redressing the wrongs done them by
Missouri. Only two out of the number, however, gave a reply. They
were Calhoun and Clay. The former was of the opinion that the general
government possessed such limited and specific powers, that the
Missouri troubles did not come within its jurisdiction. As to his
treatment of the Latter-day Saints, as the Constitution and the laws of
the Union made no distinction between citizens of different religious
creeds, he should make none; but so far as the executive was concerned
all should have the full benefit of both, and none should be exempted
from their operation. [2]
Clay partially disclaimed being a candidate for the presidency, but
said if he ever entered into that high office, he must do so free and
unfettered, with no guarantees but such as might be drawn from his
whole life, character and conduct. But he was careful to say, that he
had watched the progress of the Saints, and sympathized with them in
their sufferings under injustice, which had been inflicted upon them;
and thought that they, in common with other religious communities,
should enjoy the security and protection of the Constitution and laws.
To these letters the Prophet Joseph wrote scathing replies. The
particular portion of Calhoun's answer with which he dealt, was that
which claimed that the general government had no jurisdiction in the
case of the Saints and Missouri, and handled rather severely the
senator's doctrine of the limited powers of the general government. [3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account