The Rise of the Mediaeval Church: And Its Influence on the Civilization of Western Europe from the First to the Thirteenth Century — John Shaqi
The Rise of the Mediaeval Church: And Its Influence on the Civilization of Western Europe from the First to the Thirteenth CenturyFlick, Alexander Clarence
History
The Rise of the Mediaeval Church: And Its Influence on the Civilization of Western Europe from the First to the Thirteenth Century
Flick, Alexander Clarence
Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500
2. The important ought to be distinguished from the unimportant at every
step. Athanasius and Augustine are worthier subjects of study than
Flavian and Optatus. The invasion and conversion of the Teutons are more
important than disputes over Easter or the shape of the tonsure.
3. Original sources ought to be used so far as possible. History should
be studied "from the sources of friend and foe, in the spirit of truth
and love, _sine ira et studio_."[9:1]
4. Both Protestant and Catholic secondary authorities ought to be read
on every important controverted point.
5. Origins ought to be studied with special care.
6. Transition periods rather than crises ought to be given the most
time.
7. Biographies of epoch-making men like Constantine, Gregory the Great,
Charlemagne, Hildebrand, St. Francis, Innocent III., etc., ought to be
carefully considered.
8. Causes and results ought to be closely worked out and
classified.[9:2]
9. The continuity of the Church as a great force in the world ought to
be ever kept in mind.[9:3]
10. Differentiation ought to be thoughtfully noted through the ages.
11. The unity of history--the influence of the Church upon every other
institution--ought to be followed from one transitional period to
another.
12. The sympathetic attitude ought to be taken at all times in judging
men and movements. The student ought to stand in the centre of the
circle so that he may see all points of the circumference--all persons,
all events, all parties, all creeds, all sects, all shades of
opinion--and see their true historical relations.
SOURCES
1.--Bright, W., _The Study of Church History_. In _Waymarks of
Church History_. N. Y., 1894.
2.--Cave, A., _Introduction to the Study of Theology_. Edinb.,
1885, 421 _ff._
3.--Collins, W. E., _The Study of Ecclesiastical History_. N.
Y., 1903.
4.--Coxe, A. C., _Institutes of Christian History_. Chicago,
1887.
5.--De Witt, J., _Church History as a Science, as a Theological
Discipline, and as a Mode of the Gospel_. Cinc., 1883.
6.--Foster, F. H., _The Seminary Method of Original Study in the
Historical Sciences_. N. Y., 1888.
7.--Gwatkin, H. M., _The Meaning of Ecclesiastical History_.
Camb., 1891.
8.--Hatch, E., _An Introductory Lecture on the Study of
Ecclesiastical History_. Lond., 1885.
9.--Hitchcock, R. D. _The True Idea and Uses of Church History_.
N. Y., 1856.
10.--Jortin, J., _The Use and Importance of Ecclesiastical
History_. _Works_, vii., 405-454. Lond., 1772.
11.--Lea, H. C., _Studies in Church History_. Introd. Phil.,
1869.
12.--McGiffert, A. C., "The Historical Study of Christianity."
_Bibliotheca Sacra_, Jan., 1893, 150-171.
13.--Robinson, J. H., _Sacred and Profane History_. In _An. Rep.
Am. Hist. Assn._ 1899, i., 527.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account