The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
But it is superfluous to insist upon the existence of a fact, the
proofs of which are to be found in all ages and countries--in the
oldest codes as well as in the oldest books, in the most ancient
legends of poets as well as in the best accredited traditions of
history. Indeed, the institution of direct or personal slavery is so
ancient, that its origin is lost in the night of ages, and is nowhere
accounted for. It appears to have been coeval with the origin of
society itself. Wherever we find the beginning of civil institutions
recorded, there we find slavery already established. Moses founded the
institutions of the Jews; and slavery is found in the books of Moses.
Homer is prior, by many ages, to the historic times of Greece; and
slavery is found in the books of Homer. The “Twelve Tables” are the
basis of Roman institutions; and Romulus, long anterior to the “Twelve
Tables,” opened an asylum at Rome to receive the runaway slaves of
Laticum. At later epochs, the Salic law, the feudal and forest laws,
the common or traditionary law of the Saxons, Thuringians, Germans,
and Anglo-Saxons, are the starting points of the institutions of
most modern nations; and slavery is found in all the codes of the
invaders--it is expressly mentioned or tacitly assumed in all. Let us
note it here as an important consideration, that in all these monuments
of legislation, whether poetic or historic, slavery is not treated
as a thing instituted for the first time; it is only made incidental
mention of as a pre-existing thing, already acknowledged, accepted,
established; it was what the French call _un fait accompli_--a settled
fact. Moses, Homer, the “Twelve Tables,” the mediæval laws of
invasion, do not institute or found slavery; they but bear testimony
to its existence, either by incidental mention of it, or by imposing
new conditions to regulate the relation of master and slaves; in short,
they only go to show that slavery _was_ before they _were_, or, in
other words, that slavery was not (to use the language of jurists) the
work of positive law, but a “great fact” anterior to all law, and as
old as the origin of society itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account