The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out — John Shaqi
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go outO'Brien, James Bronterre
History
The rise, progress, and phases of human slavery: How it came into the world and how it shall be made to go out
O'Brien, James Bronterre
Labor; Labor movement; Slavery; Social problems; Working class
it follows that, in the absence of all other competent authority, it
must have been the natural authority of parents over their offspring
that first established slavery. Such slavery must, of course, in the
first instance have been direct; for, in a rude and primitive society,
no other would be intelligible or possible.
If we be right in these antecedents, our conclusions from them must be,
that the first fathers were the first masters, and the first children
were the first slaves. To determine the history of the first masters
is,therefore, virtually to suggest the history of the first slaves.
Yes, the unbounded power of paternity in the first ages of the world
was the origin of all human slavery; and therefore is slavery a thing
anterior to all written constitutions, to all human laws, traditional
or imposed.
Now come the questions, Why did our first parents make slaves of
their children? and how came the domestic institution, established by
parental despotism, to become a social institution diffused throughout
the whole of society? Our natural instincts, undeveloped by reason
and undisciplined by knowledge and experience, would, methinks, lead
us to account satisfactorily for both facts. It was natural that the
head of the family should govern the family. It was not unnatural that
the parent, who had given life to the child, and who had preserved
that life when the child was unable to take care of itself, should
in some measure regard that life as his own; and as the maintenance
of his offspring must have been a burden on the parent, and kept him
comparatively poor in the days of early manhood, it is no more than
what we should expect from the selfishness of old age--especially in
a rude social state--that he should seek to indemnify himself, by the
future labour of his children, for his cost and pains in bringing them
up. Let us also bear in mind, that we are treating of those primitive
times when man’s animal instincts interpreted polygamy and the law of
nature to be one and the same--times which Dryden describes as
“Those ancient times, e’er priestcraft did begin--
’Twas e’er polygamy was deemed a sin.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account