The Ritual Movement: Three plain sermons preached at St. John the Evangelist's, HammersmithCowan, James Galloway
Religion
The Ritual Movement: Three plain sermons preached at St. John the Evangelist's, Hammersmith
Cowan, James Galloway
Bible. Corinthians, 1st, XIV, 40 -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons -- 19th century; Ritualism -- Sermons; Sermons, English
But you are not left to spontaneity. When God chose for Himself a people
to honour and serve Him, to be witnesses for His honour, to bring in due
time all nations to serve and worship Him, He taught that people what
kind of House they should build Him, and with what kind of ritual they
should serve Him; treating the matter of such importance as actually to
inspire the architects, to prescribe each article of furniture and every
detail of ornament, to appoint precisely the ceremonies and observances.
And what did He require? That the material of house and ornament should
be of the best and costliest and most splendid; that every act, every
feeling of worship should have its corresponding sign in some ritualistic
observance; that among the accessories of worship should be attractions
for means of enlisting men’s various senses; colour, and pattern and
ornament for the eye, music for the ear, fragrant perfume for the scent.
This is God’s pattern of what is decorous: His prescription of order.
But you object: “No, this _was_ God’s pattern and order: but it was all
appointed under a different dispensation from Christianity, for a rude
and childish people, as pictures and types and carnal ordinances, to be
exchanged when men were fit, when the Messiah should come, for inward and
invisible realities, for purely spiritual things, which heart and mind
alone could apprehend, which outward sense would rather obscure than
discover.”
Now, of course, Judaism was in some respects a different dispensation
from Christianity, and some even of its divinely appointed observances
were merely temporary, and had a significance and use for Jews which they
would not have for us. But it is quite an error to suppose that these
Jews were a rude and childish people; they were rather the civilised and
cultivated and most spiritual of the earth. Albeit, if we might dare to
say so, for them more than for us, or for any other people whom God has
since drawn near to Himself, an elaborate outward and sensuous worship
(if it were not the right, the necessary, the permanent accompaniment of
inward realities) was unsuitable and fraught with danger. They had just
come out from the home of idolatry; they were going to dwell among the
observers of carnal and idolatrous rites; they were themselves hankering
after visible objects of worship; they would again and again make
stumbling blocks for themselves out of the very things which God
appointed for their edification in His worship. Now ascribing to God, as
we must always do, perfect wisdom and clearest foresight, is it
presumptuous to say that He would have kept these snares from the Jews,
that he would have drawn off their minds from the external and the
naturally magnificent, and rather would have _forbidden_ than _enforced_
minute ritual and much worship of the body, as things through which they
were sure to err, unless there were in the things themselves intrinsic
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account