If you take such a very old road as that of the primitive British
trackway whose two branches, from Stonehenge and Winchester, unite in
what is called the “Pilgrim’s Way” and make for the Straits of Dover,
you find this trackway crossing the Mole, the Wey, and the Medway, as
also the Darenth, at places where the obvious consideration has been
a dry approach upon either side, and not the local shallowness of the
stream. (We must remember in this connection that the word “ford” is
used at plenty of places where the stream is too deep for crossing on
foot: it means simply “a going.” A false etymology here has misled many
historians.) Of more importance to the first makers of the Road than
the depth of a water course was its swiftness. We have in this country
few examples of swift streams of any magnitude, and none of streams
so swift as to be impassable or passable with great difficulty, but
where such examples occur abroad it is easy to see what a boundary and
obstacle a rapid current afforded. It works in all manner of ways to
the disadvantage of travel, it makes both swimming and ferrying more
difficult (or impossible), it makes bridging either more difficult or
(in early times) impossible, it usually connotes great differences of
level, sudden floods, etc., and it also usually connotes changes and
variety of currents, as well as the destruction of the banks.
At an early stage in the development of the Road came the use of the
bridge, and with the bridge the original chief consideration--a dry
approach from either side--was emphasized. It is true that fords
were bridged as roads developed, but the bridging of a ford is not
the normal origin of the bridge. The normal origin of the bridge, if
we judge by any one of the original great roads of Europe, is the
replacing of a ferry. Men took the obstacle of a river (on account
of its length) as something hardly to be turned, save perhaps in its
higher reaches. They made straight for it, seeking only firm ground
from which to embark and disembark, and established a boat crossing. To
_this_ rather than to the ford the bridge succeeded. They bridged it
with increasing success as their material science increased in power,
and you may see all over Europe the great bridges thrown, not where the
river was shallowest nor where it was easiest to traverse for any other
reason, but chiefly where the main road led. In other words, the bridge
is a function of the Road rather than the Road of the bridge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account