Therefore their chief trouble with the Welsh mountaineers during that
earlier moment was with those of the Central mountains rather than of
the North. They had, it is true, established their garrison in Chester.
But in making their first great trunk road they had been compelled to
choose a more southern terminal, hence what is still called the Watling
Street curls round by Penkridge (a Roman name descended from the Roman
place-name of the Itinerary) and then makes westward. Later, when the
conquest was more complete, a branch was thrown out from Shrewsbury
northward to Chester. Long after a short cut was driven from Penkridge
to Chester direct. We have grounds for belief that this last road was
of later and inferior work, because, though the traces of it survive,
the main work has almost wholly disappeared.
It stands to reason that the original trackway before the Romans came
would have run pretty directly from London to Chester without going
round by the Shrewsbury district; and, indeed, the course to which all
the first part of the Watling Street points is evidence of that. When
the Roman military engineers began their thorough rebuilding of the
roads (in the most permanent fashion in the world) they were at first
confined to the southern plain, in which alone they felt secure, and
hence was that deflection round westward towards Shrewsbury created
which has affected the whole of English history.
You may next observe the Road producing the economic effect of
maintaining towns, and especially ports. A road being driven from an
existing port to some inland terminus and the port later becoming less
and less useful, either through the building of ships too deep for it
or silting up or what not, the mere existence of the Road tends to
make men cling to the port in spite of its disadvantages. They will,
as a rule, from the effect of custom and of vested interest, from the
attraction of the points already established on the Road, expend in the
maintenance of the port more energy than would have been required to
build an alternative road to some new and better port. The effect of
this is very marked in Northern France. Boulogne was not only the great
Roman port of the channel because it stood in the Narrows; it was also
of such importance because it was in antiquity a very broad, secure,
land-locked estuary, stretching over what is now all dry land up above
the town three miles towards Pont-de-Briques. Centuries ago the harbour
silted up, and if it had been left alone it would be hardly serviceable
at all. But every effort has been made to maintain that point. Boulogne
harbour has been steadily maintained artificially for centuries
because the road led to it and needed it, and the alternative use of
the far superior estuary of the Seine, with the corresponding growth of
Havre, only came quite late in history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account