The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.Latham, T.
History
The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.
Latham, T.
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
the business himself as he went to Birmingham. This he did not do, but
took his journey to Birmingham, leaving all in the greatest confusion
among his friends at Kingham and Banbury. The report quickly spread, and
such was the popular indignation, that it was found necessary to keep the
Meeting-house shut up, as both that and the persons who had attended it
were in danger, from the insults of the enraged people of the town; the
people were hooted and shouted at in the streets, and branded with the
opprobrious name of S—m—s; the same was written upon the doors, walls,
and window-shutters of the place of worship, and fears were entertained
that the Chapel would have been burnt or pulled down. Messrs. J. and T.
Gardenner now went over to Kingham to investigate the whole affair, the
particulars of which are as follows:—It appeared that whenever Church had
occasion to sleep from home he always wished to have a man or boy to
sleep with him. At Kingham he sometimes slept with the son of a
gentleman, who always made him welcome to his house when at that place,
whom he used to clasp round the neck, after preaching, and say to him,
“_Come_, _now_, _you must be my bed-fellow to-night_.” But the son at
length refusing to be his bed-fellow, he had the servant boy in his
place, for as yet nothing was suspected; at length both of them refused
sleeping with Mr. Church; and when the reason was demanded, the son said
“I don’t like to deep with Mr. Church, because he always — on me in bed;”
the boy said “I don’t like sleeping with Mr. Church, because he — me so
much.” From this rustic and simple statement of the boys the inference
was easily drawn; and as the boys at every examination told the same
tale, both when examined by the gentleman of the house, by Messrs.
Gardenners’, and also from Mr. Church’s refusing to go to Kingham, and
from many things that now came out in different quarters, as well as from
many things in Mr. Church’s letter, no doubt remained but that he had
acted imprudently and indelicately, to speak in no more glaring terms;
and the people at Banbury thought they were fully justified in disowning
him for their Minister, and all the neighbourhood was of the same
opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account