The Rogerenes: some hitherto unpublished annals belonging to the colonial history of ConnecticutBolles, John R. (John Rogers)
History
The Rogerenes: some hitherto unpublished annals belonging to the colonial history of Connecticut
Bolles, John R. (John Rogers)
Rogerenes -- History
The Rogerene leaders appeared, in their writings, as consistent
Christians, contending, by word and example, for the religion set forth
in the New Testament, a religion depending not upon the observance of
forms or of days, but upon love to God and the neighbor. They maintained
that the civil government had no right to dictate in matters of
religion; that the Christian church had but one lawgiver and judge, the
Lord Himself. The divine commands regarding religion as set forth in the
New Testament they would strictly obey, but they would, “for
conscience’s sake,” obey no command of men in this regard. The purely
civil laws they held themselves bound to observe, according to Christ’s
command. Had Sunday laws been instituted for avowedly sanitary and moral
purposes, and for the convenience and protection of church-going people,
none would have conformed to such laws more conscientiously than the
Rogerenes, such obedience being in the line of their preaching and
practice regarding the civil laws. But because they were commanded to
keep this day “sacred,” as a religious duty and necessity, and such
observance was accounted a vital part of a religious life, they would
not join in what seemed to them to be more of the nature of heathen
idolatry than of the religion instituted by Jesus Christ.
At a period when extreme regard for the first day “Sabbath” was one of
the most readily accepted signs of a religious life, and no laws were
more rigidly enforced than those which guarded that “sacred” day from
desecration, the Rogerenes conscientiously ignored its sacredness. At a
period when the materia medica was founded largely upon erroneous ideas
and practices, when surgery was bungling and blundering and he who
called a physician was, frequently, more liable to die of the so-called
remedy than of the disease, the Rogerenes elected to trust their health
and their lives to Nature and to Nature’s God, in the manner prescribed
in the New Testament, and they appear to have profited by their
choice.[1] At a period when no men were more in favor of war than those
who preached—in parts—the gospel of Him who bade His followers to
forgive their enemies, to love them and pray for them and to return good
for evil, the Rogerenes stood for uniform peace and good will on the
part of Christians, according to the spirit and the letter of the
Master’s teachings. At a period when the law called upon all to support
a state church, the Rogerenes refused to pay towards the support of a
church of whose teachings they largely disapproved, or to either give or
take anything for a ministry which Christ established as a free gift
from those gifted by Him. Driven by the intolerance of their times to
protect their obnoxious sect from extinction at the hands of powerful
enemies, as best they could, the Rogerenes employed, at critical
periods, a peaceable yet effective mode of defense, in the line of
Gospel testimony, which enraged their opponents while it kept them
fairly at bay.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account