The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the RepublicBotsford, George Willis
History
The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the Republic
Botsford, George Willis
Constitutional law -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
included an article of the kind for the decemviri agris adsignandis
to be elected under it. But as the title to an office was impaired
by any informality in the elective process, and as Servilius foresaw
that the lex curiata might be prevented by tribunician intercession or
other cause, he inserted in his bill a further provision, referred to
above,[1113] that the decemviri might be officials optima lege[1114] even
without the curiate sanction. From what is here said it is clear that
the condition of iustus or optima lege was not obtained for a magistrate
by the passing of the curiate act alone, but rather by due attention to
all formalities,[1115] which were brought to completion by that act.
The formula for the curiate law, in addition to its resemblance to that
for elections, must have contained some reference to the imperium, as we
may infer from the frequent designation of the law as a lex de imperio
by Cicero. From this phrase modern writers infer that the curiate act
conferred the imperium upon newly elected magistrates. The question
whether it granted to a magistrate powers which he did not already
possess will be considered below. For the present it is enough to state
that in no instance do the ancients speak of “conferring” the imperium by
the curiate law or of deriving the imperium from that law by any process
whatsoever. But mention is made of conferring the imperium by a decree of
the senate or by the suffrages of the people in the centuriate or tribal
assembly[1116] and of _confirming_ it by the curiate law.[1117]
The consuls and the praetor were elected by the centuries, and their
imperium was sanctioned by the curiae. The dictator, too, was obliged
to carry a curiate law.[1118] But the quaestors, the curule aediles,
and other inferior magistrates, after their election by the tribes, did
not themselves convoke the curiae for sanctioning their election; the
lex was proposed in their behalf by a higher magistrate.[1119] As the
origin of this custom we may suppose that the kings, and after them the
higher magistrates of the early republic, used to ask the people for a
pledge of loyalty not only to themselves but also to their assistants,
and that this custom continued even after they had come to be elective
magistrates. To functionaries who lacked the imperium the expression lex
de imperio could not apply; lex de potestate, though not occurring in our
sources, would be the appropriate phrase.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account