The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the RepublicBotsford, George Willis
History
The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the Republic
Botsford, George Willis
Constitutional law -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
The first act of the centuriate assembly according to Livy,[1350] who has
certainly placed the beginning of its functions at the earliest possible
date,[1351] was the election of the first two consuls. Thereafter
these comitia not only continued to elect the consuls, but also
naturally acquired the right to choose all elective higher magistrates,
extraordinary as well as ordinary, who were entrusted temporarily
or permanently with some or all of the consular power—including the
decemviri legibus scribundis, 451, 450, the tribuni militum consulari
potestate, beginning in 444, the two censors, beginning in 443 (or 435?),
and the praetors, increased gradually from one in 366 to sixteen under
Caesar.[1352] The activity of this assembly in elections expanded with
the growth in the number of offices; and its importance was further
enhanced by the opening of the patrician magistracies to plebeians.
The validity of a centuriate elective act depended upon the subsequent
curiate law, which soon became a mere form, and upon the patrum
auctoritas. The latter, too, was deprived of all vitality by the Maenian
plebiscite,[1353] which required the act to be passed before the election
while the issue was uncertain.[1354] The date of this plebiscite is
unknown; but it probably followed close upon the Hortensian legislation
(287).[1355]
II. _Legislative_
In an earlier chapter[1356] it was shown that primitive Rome, like
primitive Greece, regarded law as god-given—a conception which left no
scope for legislation by a popular assembly. Though under the kings
the people may occasionally have been called to vote on a resolution
affecting their customs, the comitia curiata never acquired a law-making
function.[1357] Even the declaration of war, which historical Rome
looked upon as a lex, was issued by the king without the consent of
the community, his only need being to secure the hearty support of the
warriors.[1358] It seems probable therefore that this question came,
not before the comitia, but before a military contio.[1359] From the
custom of the soldiers to participate in the settlement of questions
touching their interests[1360] developed the function of declaring war.
The people, however, were slow in acquiring the right. It is true that
several such acts are mentioned by Dionysius for the early republic—for
the war against the Volscians, 489,[1361] against Veii, 482,[1362] and
against the Aequians and Volscians in 462.[1363] These instances may be
explained either as acclamations in contio or as exceptional votes in
the comitia centuriata, or with more probability, owing to the character
of our sources for those early times, as anticipations of later usage.
The decisive fact in the problem is that as late as 427 a controversy
arose as to whether war could be declared by order of the people only,
or whether a senatus consultum was sufficient. It was settled in favor
of the people by the threats of the plebeian tribunes to impede the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account