The calendar, as the Romans generally believed, was first published by
Cnaeus Flavius, curule aedile, in 304 B.C., who placed the _fasti_
conspicuously in the Forum, in order that every one might know on what
days legal business might be transacted[27]; in other words, a calendar
was published with the marks of the days and the indications of the
festivals. After this we hear nothing until 189 B.C., when a consul, M.
Fulvius Nobilior, adorned his temple of Hercules and the Muses with a
calendar which contained explanations or notes as well as dates[28].
These are the only indications we have of the way in which the
pre-Julian calendar was made known to the people.
But the rectification of the calendar by Julius, and the changes then
introduced, brought about a multiplication of copies of the original one
issued under the dictator’s edict[29]. Not only in Rome, but in the
municipalities round about her, where the ancient religious usage of
each city had since the enfranchisement of Italy been superseded,
officially at least, by that of Rome, both public and private copies
were made and set up either on stone, or painted on the walls or ceiling
of a building.
Of such calendars we have in all fragments of some thirty, and one which
is all but complete. Fourteen of these fragments were found in or near
Rome, eleven in municipalities such as Praeneste, Caere, Amiternum, and
others as far away as Allifae and Venusia; four are of uncertain
origin[30]; and one is a curious fragment from Cisalpine Gaul[31]. Most
of them are still extant on stone, but for a few we have to depend on
written copies of an original now lost[32]. No day in the Roman year is
without its annotation in one or more of these; the year is almost
complete, as I have said, in the Fasti Maffeiani; and several others
contain three or four months nearly perfect[33]. Two, though in a
fragmentary condition, are of special interest. One of these, that of
the ancient brotherhood of the Fratres Arvales, discovered in 1867 and
following years in the grove of the brethren near Rome, contains some
valuable additional notes in the fragments which survive of the months
from August to November. The other, that of Praeneste, containing
January, March, April and parts of February and December, is still more
valuable from the comments it contains, most of which we can believe
with confidence to have come from the hand of the great Augustan scholar
Verrius Flaccus. We are told by Suetonius that Verrius put up a calendar
in the forum at Praeneste[34], drawn up by his own hand; and the
date[35] and matter of these fragments found at Praeneste agree with
what we know of the life and writings of Verrius. It is unlucky that
recent attempts to find additional fragments should have been entirely
without result; for the whole annotated calendar, if we possessed it,
would probably throw light on many dark corners of our subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account