_C. I. L._ 207 B. Petronius (_Cena_ 30) suggests the way in which copies might be set up in private houses. In municipia copies might be made and given to the town by private persons (so probably were Maff. and Praen.) or put up by order of the decuriones. Footnote 30: Including the Fasti Maffeiani, which is almost complete. Footnote 31: No. 20 in _C. I. L._ (Guidizzolenses), found at Guidizzolo between Mantua and Verona. Footnote 32: Maffeiani, Tusculani, Pinciani, Venusini. Footnote 33: Those of Caere, Praeneste, Amiternum, and Antium. Footnote 34: Suet. _de Grammaticis_, 19. Footnote 35: Circ. A.D. 10: cf. _C. I. L._ 206. There are a few additional notes apparently by a later hand. Footnote 36: Menologium rusticum Colotianum, and Men. rusticum Vallense in _C. I. L._ 280, 281. Footnote 37: Merkel’s edition (1841), with its valuable Prolegomena, is indispensable; very useful too is that by H. Peter; Leipzig, 1889. Footnote 38: _Tristia_, ii. 549. Footnote 39: _C. I. L._ 297 foll. (de feriis). Footnote 40: To these we may perhaps add the _Poplifugia_ and _Lucaria_ in July, the legends about which we can neither accept nor refute. Footnote 41: See Festus, 245; and _Dict. Ant._ s. v. Sacra. Footnote 42: Varro’s works, _de Antiquitatibus humanis_ and _divinis_, and many others, only survive in the fragments quoted by later authors. Footnote 43: Paul the deacon was one of the scholars who found encouragement at the court of Charles the Great. His work is an abridgement of that of Festus, not of Verrius himself. On Verrius and his epitomators, as well as on the other writers who used his glosses, see H. Nettleship’s valuable papers in _Essays in Latin Literature_, p. 201 foll. Footnote 44: For more information about Lydus see Bury, _Later Roman Empire_, ii. 183, and below under March 14. Footnote 45: They will be found in Bücheler’s _Umbrica_ (containing the processional inscription of Iguvium with commentary and translation), and Henzen’s _Acta Fratrum Arvalium_. Footnote 46: Preller’s _Römische Mythologie_ (ed. 3, by H. Jordan) and Marquardt’s third volume of his _Staatsverwaltung_ (ed. Wissowa) are both masterpieces, not only in matter but in manner. Footnote 47: Among the others may especially be mentioned Aust, a pupil of Wissowa, to whom we owe the excellent and exhaustive article on Jupiter; and R. Peter, the author of the article Fortuna and others, who largely reflects the views of the late Prof. Reifferscheid of Breslau. Footnote 48: ‘Hoc paene unum superest sincerum documentum,’ Wissowa, _de Feriis_, p. 1. Footnote 49: This is well illustrated in the _Acta Fratrum Arvalium_ referred to above. Footnote 50: A succinct account of these tendencies will be found in Marquardt, p. 72 foll. There is a French translation of this invaluable volume. Footnote 51: