Festus, 254 ‘Quinquatrus appellari quidam putant a numero dierum qui
fere his (? feriis iis) celebrantur: qui scilicet errant tam hercule
quam qui triduo Saturnalia, et totidem diebus Compitalia; nam omnibus
his singulis diebus fiunt sacra. Forma autem vocabuli eius exemplo
multorum populorum Italicorum enuntiata est, quod post diem quintum
Iduum est is dies festus, ut apud Tusculanos Triatrus,’ &c.
Footnote 165:
Wissowa, _op. cit._ viii. We find one in April, between the Fordicidia
(April 15) and Cerialia (April 19).
Footnote 166:
Ovid, _Fasti_, 3. 809 ‘Una dies media est, et fiunt sacra Minervae,’
&c.
Footnote 167:
Ovid, _Fasti_, 3. 835 foll.
Caelius ex alto qua mons descendit in aequum,
Hic ubi non plana est sed prope plana via,
Parva licet videas Captae delubra Minervae
Quae dea natali coepit habere suo.
As from the note in Praen. we learn that March 19 was also the
dedication-day of Minerva on the Aventine, there must either be a
confusion between the two, or both had the same foundation-day. About
the day of Minerva Capta there is no doubt; for that of Minerva on the
Aventine see Aust, _de Aedibus_, p. 42.
Footnote 168:
Preller, i. 342; Usener, _Rh. Mus._, xxx. 221; Roscher, _Myth. Lex._
s. v. Mars, 2410; _Lyd. de Mens._ 4. 42; Gell. 13. 23 (from _Gellii
Annales_) is the _locus classicus_ for Nerio.
Footnote 169:
Nerio gen. Nerienis (Gell. l. c., who compares Anio Anienis).
Footnote 170:
Ovid, _Fasti_, 3. 850: ‘_forti_ sacrificare deae,’ though clearly
meant to refer to Minerva, is thought to be a reminiscence of a
characteristic of Nerio (‘the strong one’), attached to her
supplanter.
Footnote 171:
Aul. Gell. l. c.
Footnote 172:
Usener, l. c., _passim_.
Footnote 173:
H. Jordan expressed a somewhat different view in his _Symbolae ad
hist. Ital. religionum alterae_, p. 9. He thinks that ‘volgari
opinione hominum feminini numinis cum masculo coniunctionem non
potuisse non pro coniugali aestimari.’ But this would seem to imply
that the _opinio volgaris_ was a mistaken one: and if so, how should
it have arisen but under Greek influence?
Footnote 174:
Mommsen, in a note on the Feriale Cumanum (Hermes, 17. 637), calls
them _weibliche Hilfsgöttinnen_; and this is not far removed from the
view I have expressed in the text. The other alternative, viz that we
have in these names traces of an old Italian anthropomorphic age, with
a mythology, is in my view inadmissible. I see in them survivals of a
mode of thought about the supernatural which might easily lend itself
to a foreign anthropomorphizing influence.
Footnote 175:
Ovid, _Fasti_, 3. 835 foll.
Footnote 176:
Wissowa in _Lex._ s. v. Minerva 2986: a model article, to which the
reader must be referred for further information about Minerva.
Footnote 177:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account