That the Roman year originally began with March is certain[11], not only
from the evidence of the names of the months, which after June are
reckoned as 5th (Quinctilis), 6th (Sextilis), and so on, but from the
nature of the March festivals, as will be shown in treating of that
month. In the character of the religious festivals there is a distinct
break between February and March, and the operations both of nature and
of man take a fresh turn at that point. Between the festivals of
December and those of January there is no such break. No doubt January
1, just after the winter solstice, was even at an early time considered
in some sense as a beginning; but it is going too far to assume, as some
have done, that an ancient religious or priestly year began at that
point[12]. It was not on January 1, but on March 1, that the sacred fire
in the Aedes Vestae was renewed and fresh laurels fixed up on the Regia,
the two buildings which were the central points of the oldest Roman
religion[13]. March 1, which in later times at least was considered the
birthday of the special protecting deity of the Romans, continued to be
the Roman New Year’s Day long after the official beginning of the year
had been changed to January 1[14]. It was probably not till 153 B.C.,
when the consuls began to enter on office on January 1, that this
official change took place; and the date was then adopted, not so much
for religious reasons as because it was convenient, when the business of
administration was increasing, to have the consuls in Rome for some time
before they left for their provinces at the opening of the war season in
March.
No rational account can in my opinion be given of the Roman religious
calendar of the Republic unless it be taken as beginning with March; and
in this work I have therefore restored the old order of months. With the
Julian calendar I am not concerned; though it is unfortunate that all
the Roman calendars we possess, including the _Fasti_ of Ovid, date from
after the Julian era, and therefore present us with a distorted view of
the true course of the old Roman worship.
Next after March came Aprilis, the month of opening or unfolding
vegetation; then Maius, the month of growing, and Junius, that of
ripening and perfecting. After this the names cease to be descriptive of
the operations of nature; the six months that follow were called, as
four of them still are, only by their positions relative to March, on
which the whole system of the year thus turned as on a pivot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account