This plainly means that from the time when March ceased to be the first
month, the year always began with January and ended with February; in
other words the order was January, March, April, and so on, ending with
February; until the time of the Decemvirate, when February became the
second month, and December the last, as at present, January still
retaining its place. A little consideration of Ovid’s lines will,
however, suggest the conclusion that he, and his authority, whoever that
may have been, were arguing aetiologically rather than on definite
knowledge. January, they thought, must always have been the first month,
because janua, ‘a door,’ is the first thing, the entrance, through which
you pass into a new year as into a house or a temple. How, they would
argue, could a month thus named have ever been the eleventh month? This
once supposed impossible, it was necessary to infer that the place of
January was the first, from the time of its introduction, and that it
was followed by March, April, &c., February coming last of all,
immediately after December; and finally that at the time of the
Decemvirs, who are known to have made some alterations in the calendar,
the positions of January and February were reversed, January remaining
the first month, but February becoming the second.
III. The Divisions of the Month.
The Romans, with their usual conservatism, preserved the shell of the
lunar system of reckoning long after the reality had disappeared. The
month was at all times divided by the real or imaginary phases of the
moon, though a week of eight days was introduced at an early period, and
though the month was no longer a lunar one.
The two certain points in a lunar month are the first appearance of the
crescent[15] and the full moon; between these is the point when the moon
reaches the first quarter, which is a less certain one. Owing to this
uncertainty of the reckoning of the first days of the month there were
no festivals in the calendars on the days before the first quarter
(Nones), with a single exception of the obscure _Poplifugia_ on July 5.
The day of the new moon was called Kalendae, as Varro tells us, ‘quod
his diebus calantur eius mensis nonae a pontificibus, quintanae an
septimanae sint futurae, in Capitolio in curia Calabra sic: Dies te
quinque calo, Iuno Covella. Septem dies te calo Iuno Covella’[16]. All
the Kalends were sacred to Juno, whose connexion with the moon is
certain though not easy to explain.
With the Nones, which were sacred to no deity, all uncertainty ceased.
The Ides, or day of the full moon, was always the eighth after the first
quarter. This day was sacred to Jupiter; a fact which is now generally
explained as a recognition of the continuous light of the two great
heavenly bodies during the whole twenty-four hours[17]. On the Nones the
_Rex sacrorum_ (and therefore before him the king himself) announced the
dates of the festivals for the month.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account