The Roman Poets of the Republic, 3rd editionSellar, W. Y. (William Young)
History
The Roman Poets of the Republic, 3rd edition
Sellar, W. Y. (William Young)
Latin poetry -- History and criticism
The order of Nature now subsisting is declared to be the result of the
manifold combination of the atoms through infinite time and space, but
the intermediate stages by which this process was effected are assumed
rather than investigated. We seem to pass 'per saltum' from the chaos
of lifeless elements to the perfect order and manifold life of our
system. This wide chasm seems as little capable of being bridged
by the help of the atoms of Democritus, as by the watery element
of Thales or the fiery element of Heraclitus. But in Lucretius this
difficulty is partially concealed, by a poetical element in his
conception, really inconsistent with the mechanical materialism on
which his philosophy professes to be based.--It is to be observed
that while the Greek word [Greek: atoma] implies merely the notion
of individual existences, the words used by Lucretius, 'semina,'
'genitalia corpora,' really indicate a creative capacity in these
existences. In conceiving their power of carrying on and sustaining
the order of Nature, his imagination is thus aided by the analogy of
the growth of plants and living beings. A secret faculty in the atoms,
distinct from their other properties, is assumed. Thus he says--
At primordia gignundis in rebus oportet
Naturam clandestinam caecamque adhibere[21].
In his statement of the doctrine of the _Clinamen_, or slight
declension in the motion of the atoms, so as 'to break the chain of
fate,' he attributes to them a power analogous to volition in living
beings. This doctrine is suggested by the necessity of explaining
contingency in Nature and freedom in the movements of sentient beings.
We are, as in all attempts to account for creation, forced back on
the thought of an ultimate unexplained power in virtue of which things
have been created and are maintained in being.
The Lucretian hypothesis of the atoms, even if it were accepted as the
most reasonable explanation of the original constitution of matter,
is, by itself, altogether inadequate as a key to the secret of Nature.
It cannot be shown either how these atoms succeeded in arranging
themselves in order, or how from their negative properties all
positive life has been produced. The explanation of physical phenomena
given in the four last books, as to the nature of our bodies and
souls,--as to the action of outward things on the senses,--the origin
and existence of the sun and moon, the earth and the living beings
upon it, etc., although professedly deduced from the principles
established in the first two books, are really reached independently.
They are either immediate inferences from the obvious intimations of
sense, or they are the suggestions of analogy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account