Rome -- History -- Republic, 265-30 B.C. -- Fiction
his country, and to the common good of all men."
This specious and artful oration, in which, while affecting to condemn
what he dared not defend openly, he had more than insinuated a doubt of
the legality of sentencing the traitors, was listened to by all present,
with deep attention; and by the secret partizans of the conspiracy with
joy and exultation. So sure did they esteem it that, in the teeth of this
insidious argument, the Senate would not venture to inflict capital
punishment on their friends, that they evinced their approbation by loud
cheers; while many of the patrician party were shaken in their previous
convictions; and many of those who perceived the fallacy of his
sophistical reasoning, and detected his latent determination to screen the
parricides of the state, felt the hazard and difficulty of proceeding as
the exigencies of the case required.
Cicero’s brow grew dark; as Silanus avowed openly that he had altered his
opinion, and should vote for the motion of Tiberius Nero, to defer
judgment.
Then Cicero himself arose, and in the noblest perhaps of all his orations,
exerted himself strenuously to controvert the arguments and abolish the
evil influence of the noble demagogue.
He did not, indeed, openly urge the death of the traitors; but he dwelt
with tremendous force on the atrocious nature of the crimes, and on the
consequence of their success. He showed the fallacy of Cæsar’s
insinuation, that death was a less severe enactment than perpetual
imprisonment. He pointed out the impossibility and injustice of compelling
the municipalities to take charge of the prisoners—the insecurity of those
towns, as places of detention—the almost entire certainty, that the men
would ere long be released, either by some popular tumult, or some party
measure; and he concluded with a forcible and earnest peroration,
appealing to the Senators, by their love of life, of their families, of
their country, to take counsel worthily of themselves, and of their common
mother; entreating them to decree firmly, and promising that he would
execute their sentence, be it what it might, fearlessly.
As he sat down, the order was agitated like a sea in the tumultuous calm,
which succeeds to the wrath and riot created by a succession of gales
blowing from different quarters. Murmurs of approbation and encouragement
were mixed with groans and loud evidences of displeasure.
The passions of the great concourse were aroused thoroughly, and the
debate waxed wild and stormy.
Senator arose after Senator, advocating some the death, some the
banishment, and some, emboldened by Cæsar’s remarks, even proposing the
enlargement of the conspirators.
At length, when all arguments appeared to be exhausted, and no hope left
of anything like an unanimous decision being adopted, Marcus Portius Cato
arose from his seat, stern, grave, composed, and awful from the severe
integrity of his grand character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account