Rome -- History -- Republic, 265-30 B.C. -- Fiction
Still, not a Senator left his seat, or changed countenance; although it
might be seen, by the fiery glances and clinched hands of some among the
younger nobles, that they would have gladly joined the knights, in
charging their hereditary enemies, the Democratic rabble.
The question which was then debating was of more weight, however, than any
triumph over the mob; for by the decision of that question it was to be
determined whether the traitors and the treason should be crushed
simultaneously and forever, or whether Rome itself should be abandoned to
the pleasure of the rebels.
That question was the life or death of Lentulus, Cethegus, Gabinius,
Statilius, and Cæparius; all of whom were in separate custody, the last
having been brought in on the previous evening, arrested on his way to the
camp of Catiline and Manlius.
Should the Senate decree their death, the commonwealth might be deemed
safe—should it absolve them, by that weakness, the republic must be lost.
And on the turn of a die did that question seem to hang.
Decius Junius Silanus, whose opinion was first asked, spoke briefly, but
strenuously and to the point, and as became the Consul elect, soon to be
the first magistrate of that great empire. He declared for the capital
punishment of all those named above, and of four others, Lucius Cassius,
Publius Furius, Publius Umbrenus, and Quintus Annius, if they should be
thereafter apprehended.
Several others of the high Patrician family followed on the same side; and
no one had as yet ventured openly to urge the impunity of the parricides,
although Tiberius Nero had recommended a delay in taking the question, and
the casting of the prisoners meanwhile into actual incarceration under the
safeguard of a military force.
But it had now come to the turn of Caius Julius Cæsar, the great leader
then of the Democratic faction, the great captain that was to be in after
days, and the first Emperor of subjugated Rome.
An orator second, if second, to Cicero alone, ardent, impassioned, yet
bland, clement, easy; liberal both of hand and council; averse to Cicero
from personal pique, as well as from party opposition; an eager candidate
for popular applause and favor, it was most natural that he should take
side with the conspirators.
Still, his name having been coupled obscurely with their infamous designs,
although Cicero had positively refused to suffer his accusation or
impeachment, it required so much boldness, so much audacity indeed, to
enable him to stand forward as their open champion, that many men
disbelieved that he would venture on a step so hazardous.
The greatest possible anxiety was manifested, therefore, in the house,
when that distinguished Senator arose, and began in low, deep, harmonious
tones, and words which rolled forth like a gentle river in an easy and
silvery flow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account