The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
That some important object was gained by the formation of so long a
cutting is undoubted, but what that object was is a perplexing
question. It can scarcely be supposed that the garrison at ÆSICA were
dependent for their daily supply of so important an article as water
upon an open cutting outside the Barrier. The feeblest of their foes
could, in an instant, cut off the provision. No doubt the country, for
some distance north of the Wall, was held in subjection by the Roman
forces, but when the Wall was built, and the station planned, such was
not the case. The station itself is not destitute of water. A well,
sunk some years ago, to the depth of twenty-four feet, yields to the
tenants of the farm-house an unfailing supply. I am disposed to think
that the water brought by the cutting was to give to the north rampart
of the station the advantage of a wet ditch. By throwing an embankment
across the depression on the north of the station, as it begins to
slope down to the bed of the Haltwhistle-burn, a considerable body of
water would lodge here. The station of ÆSICA was an important one. In
a particularly wild district, at an unusual distance from the great
lines of Roman communication, and close beside the great opening in
the mural ridge, by which the waters of the Forest of Lowes effect a
passage to the low grounds, it would be peculiarly exposed to the
attacks of the enemy. Although somewhat elevated above the ground
north of the Wall, it is not so much so as to be impregnable on that
quarter. A body of water collected here to keep the enemy at a still
greater distance might not be beneath the attention of the garrison.
Any temporary interference with the aqueduct would in this case be
productive of no inconvenience. The existence of a water-course on the
enemy’s side of the Wall at HUNNUM, which may have served a similar
purpose, has already been noticed. At BREMENIUM, High Rochester, some
guttered stones, covered with flags, were recently found lying in a
direction which led to the supposition, that they brought water from
some springs outside the station to the eastern moat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account