The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
In the Archæologia Æliana[117] is a plan and description of an ancient
aqueduct, which brought water from some distant rivulets to the
station at Lanchester. It consists of two branches, the longer of
which is nearly four miles in extent. Earthen embankments, to preserve
the level, are occasionally used in both of them, and, as they run
over sandy ground, the bottom of them has been puddled. The two lines,
after uniting, deliver their water into a reservoir outside the
station, near to its south-west corner. That the water of this
aqueduct cannot have been used for domestic purposes appears from what
Hodgson, the author of the paper, adds—‘Several wells have, from time
to time, been discovered here by labourers, on the outside of the
walls, and there is a plentiful spring at a short distance from where
the bath stood.’
Whatever may have been the object served, the water-course at ÆSICA is
a striking memorial of the skill, forethought, and industry of the
Roman garrisons. At the present day, in a highly civilized country,
and after the enjoyment of a long period of internal peace, we are but
beginning to see the necessity of bringing water from a distance into
our large towns. An individual garrison, exposed to all the hazards of
war, scrupled not, even fourteen or sixteen centuries ago, for some
purpose which they thought important, to cut a water-course six miles
long!
It is not a little remarkable too, that after the lapse of so long a
period, the cutting should be distinctly visible through so large a
portion of its track.
The view which is here taken of the object of the water-course is not
given because it is absolutely satisfactory, but because it presents
the fewest difficulties. We might have expected that if a miniature
lake had been formed on the north of the station, some remains of the
embankment necessary to confine its waters would appear; none are,
however, to be observed. The soil, on being turned up, has not the
black and sludgy aspect, which might be anticipated, but is of a
yellow hue; the bottom of a pond at Wall-mill, which was drained
within living memory, has, however, a precisely similar appearance.
To the south of Great Chesters is Wall-mill, near to which the burying
ground of the station seems to have been. Brand observed here several
remarkable barrows, and was shewn some of the graves which had been
opened. ‘They consisted,’ he tells us, ‘of side stones set down into the
earth, and covered at top with other larger stones.’ He took them to be
very early Christian sepulchres; this is more than doubtful. The
progress of agricultural improvement has obliterated all traces of the
cemetery; to one, however, of its sepulchral monuments reference will
afterwards be made.
The Romans systematically avoided intra-mural interments. The following
is one of the laws of the Twelve Tables:
HOMINEM MORTUUM IN URBE NE SEPELITO NEVE URITO.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account