But Feuillet is more than a townsman: he is a teller of fairy-tales. To
him the country is a free playground for his fancy. There beautiful
ladies and gallant knights have nothing to do but to love and to sing;
and there, without destroying our illusion, he can leave them to live
happily forever after. The Brittany, in which Maxime and Marguerite
meet and misunderstand and woo and wed, is not that northwestern corner
of France that one can reach in a few hours by steamer from Southampton;
it is a Brittany of fairy woods and streams and castles, that never was,
save in the poet’s dream. For if others of Feuillet’s novels have been
only in part fairy-tales, or only rather like fairy-tales, the _Romance
of a Poor Young Man_ is a fairy-tale wholly and absolutely. The
personages of the story are the invariable personages of the fairy-tale:
the prince disguised as a wood-cutter, in the Marquis de Champcey
disguised as a farm-bailiff; the haughty princess, who will not love,
yet loves despite her will, and is rewarded by the wood-cutter’s
appearing in all the prince’s splendour at the proper time, in
Marguerite Laroque; the bad prince and the bad princess, in M. de
Bévallon and Mlle. Hélouin; the good magician, in M. Laubépin; and the
delightfullest of conceivable fairy godmothers, in Mlle. de Porhoët.
And the progress of the story is the wonted progress of the fairy-tale.
There is hardship, but it is overcome; there are perils, but they are
turned; misconceptions, but they are cleared up. There are empty
pockets, but there is the bag of gold waiting to fill them. The
marvellous never shocks our credulity, the longest-armed coincidences
seem the most natural happenings in the world. We are not in the least
surprised when, at the right moment, the bag of gold appears at Maxime’s
feet, enabling him to marry; it is the foregone consequence of his
having a fairy godmother. We don’t even raise the eyebrow of doubt when
the Laroques contemplate relinquishing their fortune to the poor, so
that Marguerite may come to her lover empty-handed; that is the accepted
device of the fairy-tale for administering to the proud princess her
well-deserved humiliation. In one small detail only does the fairy-tale
teller lose himself, and let the novelist supplant him; that is where he
implies that the bad prince and princess, after their wicked wiles had
been discovered, took the train to Paris. They did nothing of the sort.
They were turned into blocks of stone, and condemned to look on at the
happiness of the good prince and princess from the terrace of the
Château de Laroque.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account