The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal lifeGrew, Edwin Sharpe
Science
The Romance of Modern Geology: Describing in simple but exact language the making of the earth with some account of prehistoric animal life
Grew, Edwin Sharpe
Geology; Paleontology
We have no doubt that this was the order of the successive peoples
occupying the site of London. It is obvious. Why is it? We see that
there are, broadly, three layers or deposits. The upper layer is that
which encloses the foundations and rubbish of our own era and times.
Next below is that which encloses the relics of Roman occupation. At
the bottom lies that which encloses the scanty traces of the early
flint-folk. The uppermost deposit is necessarily the newest, for it
could not be laid down until after the accumulation of those below
it; and those below it must be progressively older, as they are
traced deeper from the surface. By the mere fact that the layers lie
one above the other we are furnished with a simple clue which enables
us to determine the order of their formation. We may know nothing
whatever as to how old they are, measured by years or centuries. But
we can be absolutely certain that the bottom layer came first, and
the top layer came last. This kind of observation will enable us to
find proofs everywhere that the surface of the land has not always
been what it is to-day. In some districts, for example, when the dark
layer of soil in which vegetables grow is turned up, there may be
found beneath it sand and gravel full of smooth, well-rounded stones.
Such materials are to be seen in course of formation where water
keeps them moving to and fro, as on the beds of rivers, the margins
of lakes, or the shallow shores of the sea. Wherever smooth-rolled
pebbles occur they point to the influence of moving water, so that
we conclude, even though the site is now dry, that water once moved
above it. Again, below the soil in other regions lie layers of
oysters and other sea shells.
Pits, quarries, and mines that cut down still deeper into the earth
and lay it bare bring before our eyes most impressive testimony
regarding the ancient changes of the land. Suppose, by way of further
illustration, that underneath a bed of sand full of oyster shells
there lies a dark brown band of peat. This substance, composed of
mosses and other water-loving plants, is formed in boggy places by
the growth of marshy vegetation. Below the peat there might occur
a layer of soft white marl full of lake shells, such as may be
observed on the bottom of many lakes at the present time. These
three layers--oyster beds, peat, and marl--would be like a family
pedigree showing the history of the place. The bottom layer of white
marl would show that there was once a lake. The next layer of peat
would show that by the growth of marshy vegetation the lake became
choked up and was gradually changed into a swamp and then a morass.
The other layer of oyster shells would show that the ground was
afterwards submerged by the sea. The present condition of the ground
would show that the sea at last retired, and the place passed into
dry land as it is to-day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account