Nicholas I, who succeeded Alexander, represents the struggle of the
dynasty in a form which might be reconciled with conscience. He differed
materially from Alexander in two respects. First, although he was, like
Alexander, moderately endowed in intellect, he had great strength of
character and would stubbornly pursue any policy which he adopted. In
the second place, that policy was inevitably shaped by the accident that
he was born many years after Alexander. The eldest son of Paul I had
received his education at a time when Catherine was under the influence
of the French humanitarians. Nicholas came to the years of discretion
during her second phase, when the Revolution had soured her taste of all
things French and liberal. His chief tutor had been a French emigrant,
an incompetent teacher and a bitter enemy of liberal ideas. Nicholas had
grown up a rough and conceited boy. Later he had had abler teachers, but
he had yawned over their lessons. He had in 1817 married a daughter of
the King of Prussia, and, like almost all the Romanoffs, he thought a
minute acquaintance with military drill the first equipment for life. In
spite of hints from Alexander he refused to prepare for the serious task
of governing a great nation. By an unfortunate accident his vague
despotic mood was at the very opening of his reign hardened into an
attitude of fierce hostility to the new culture.
His elder brother Constantine had, as I said, forfeited his right to the
throne. He had fallen in love with a charming Polish lady, the Countess
Jeannette Grudzinsky, after divorcing his first wife. As no amount of
personal charm, not associated with royal blood, fitted a woman to
occupy the throne of Elizabeth and Catherine, the Tsar had, in 1822,
given him the alternative of losing either the lady or his right to the
throne. Constantine had not a regal disposition. He married Jeannette
and abdicated the right he had to the throne on the restored principle
of inheritance.
Nicholas knew of this abdication, though it was otherwise known only to
a few intimate councillors. But he knew that there was much feeling
against him in St. Petersburg, and he proceeded diplomatically. He
proclaimed Constantine Tsar. Prince Golitzin and others who knew of the
abdication begged him to refrain until the Council had opened a certain
sealed letter which Alexander had left, but Nicholas persisted and sent
word to his brother at Warsaw. Constantine refused the throne, and for
several weeks letters went backward and forward. Nicholas was very much
attached to his brother, but it is probable that he wanted time to study
the threatening situation in St. Petersburg and secure the stability of
his throne. He yielded on December 13th, and fixed the following day for
the taking of the oath of allegiance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account