The first measure won for him the gratitude of the clergy. The Russian
Church was still in effect the Greek Church. Its supreme head was the
Patriarch of Constantinople, who sustained his tattered dignity among
the Mohammedans. Boris induced this man to create a Patriarch of Moscow,
and he thus won the increasing favour of the clergy. His other measure
was one of great and terrible significance for the poor “Christians.”
The expansion of Russia had created large new estates, and the great
land-owners continually attracted peasants away from the smaller
estates. But the small land-owners, who formed the yeomanry or cavalry
of the Empire, were not a body to be despised, either in the interest of
the country or of an aspiring politician. It is said that in 1592 Boris
played for their support by issuing an imperial decree which forbade the
peasants to go from one estate to another. Some Russian historians deny
this. If the document is genuine, they say, it meant only that Boris
legally fixed a practice which had gradually arisen, on account of the
mischief of these peasant-migrations. However that may be, there is no
doubt that Boris Godunoff legally established serfdom in Russia at a
time when it was being abandoned elsewhere. The peasants grumbled and
suffered, but they now had upon their backs an autocracy that treated
their wishes with entire contempt.
As the reign of Feodor (1584-1598) wore on, and no son appeared, Boris
pushed his ambition to greater lengths. The heir to the throne would now
be the young Prince Dmitri, the son of Ivan the Terrible’s seventh wife.
Early in the reign of Feodor the nobles had compelled Dmitri’s ambitious
mother to take her infant son and her relatives to a remote provincial
estate, and from that exile the mother and her kin nervously studied the
failing health of Tsar Feodor and the condition of his wife. The
subjection of women in Russia does not seem to have extinguished their
ambition, and there was at the court itself the usual party, out of
power, which espoused the hope of a possible dynasty. The court seethed
once more with sordid passion.
In 1591 the Dmitri faction at court was shattered by the announcement
that the young prince was dead. Boris ordered an inquiry, and as a
result he announced that, owing to the carelessness of his mother in
supervising him, Dmitri had committed suicide. With becoming zeal the
virtual Regent forced the mother to enter a nunnery and consigned her
relatives to various prisons. Moscow at large, reflecting that the
tragedy removed an important obstacle from Boris’s path to the throne,
preferred to believe that his servants had murdered the prince. That is
the general opinion of historians, but there are some who maintain that
the child was not murdered at all, and that the adventurer who will
presently enter the story was really Dmitri.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account