The Romantic Scottish Ballads: Their Epoch and AuthorshipChambers, Robert
History
The Romantic Scottish Ballads: Their Epoch and Authorship
Chambers, Robert
Ballads, Scots -- Scotland -- History and criticism
Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
[Illustration: THE ROMANTIC SCOTTISH BALLADS:
THEIR EPOCH AND AUTHORSHIP.
ROBERT CHAMBERS.
1849]
THE ROMANTIC SCOTTISH BALLADS: THEIR EPOCH AND AUTHORSHIP.
Percy's _Reliques of Ancient English Poetry_, 1765; David Herd's
_Scottish Songs_, 1769; Scott's _Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border_,
1802; and Jamieson's _Popular Ballads and Songs_, 1806, have been
chiefly the means of making us acquainted with what is believed to be
the ancient traditionary ballad literature of Scotland; and this
literature, from its intrinsic merits, has attained a very great fame.
I advert particularly to what are usually called the Romantic Ballads,
a class of compositions felt to contain striking beauties, almost
peculiar to themselves, and consequently held as implying extraordinary
poetical attributes in former generations of the people of this
country. There have been many speculations about the history of these
poems, all assigning them a considerable antiquity, and generally
assuming that their recital was once the special business of a set of
wandering _conteurs_ or minstrels. So lately as 1858, my admired
friend, Professor Aytoun, in introducing a collection of them, at once
ample and elegant, to the world, expressed his belief that they date at
least from before the Reformation, having only been modified by
successive reciters, so as to modernise the language, and, in some
instances, bring in the ideas of later ages.
There is, however, a sad want of clear evidence regarding the history
of our romantic ballads. We have absolutely no certain knowledge of
them before 1724, when Allan Ramsay printed one called _Sweet William's
Ghost_, in his _Tea-table Miscellany_. There is also this fact staring
us in the face, that, while these poems refer to an ancient state of
society, they bear not the slightest resemblance either to the minstrel
poems of the middle ages, or to the well-known productions of the
Henrysons, the Dunbars, the Douglases, the Montgomeries, who flourished
in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Neither in the poems of
Drummond, and such other specimens of verse--generally wretched--as
existed in the seventeenth century, can we trace any feature of the
composition of these ballads. Can it be that all editors hitherto
have been too facile in accepting them as ancient, though modified
compositions? that they are to a much greater extent modern than has
hitherto been supposed? or wholly so? Though in early life an editor of
them, not less trusting than any of my predecessors, I must own that a
suspicion regarding their age and authorship has at length entered my
mind. In stating it--which I do in a spirit of great deference to
Professor Aytoun and others--I shall lead the reader through the steps
by which I arrived at my present views upon the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account