The Round Towers of Ireland; or, The History of the Tuath-De-DanaansO'Brien, Henry
Religion
The Round Towers of Ireland; or, The History of the Tuath-De-Danaans
O'Brien, Henry
Ireland -- Antiquities; Round towers -- Ireland
The identity of Ireland with the _Insula Hyperboreorum_ is deduced from a
description of the latter, copied by Diodorus Siculus from the writings of
Hecatæus and from a compendium by Marcianus Herocleotes of the works of
Artemidorus. Both Hecatæus and Artemidorus lived before the Christian era,
and an allusion in the latter author to certain “round temples,” of which
the officiating priests were called _Boreades_, that existed in
“_Juvernia_, a British isle, bounded on the north by the ocean called the
_Hyperborean_, but on the east by the ocean called the _Hibernian_,”
coupled with the fact that (with the exception of those at Brechin and
Abernethy) no remains of round temples are found in any of the British
Isles save Ireland,[28] goes far to prove the identity in question, also
the pre-Christian antiquity of the round towers, together with the
existence of an exceptional, and therefore by natural inference an
_imported_, civilisation in that island. The latter inference is
strengthened by continually-recurring traces of the great proficiency of
its inhabitants in the fine, or useful, arts at an era when the adjacent
islands were still plunged in barbarism.
CHAPTER XXVIII
(PP. 412-431)
These proofs of an adventitious civilisation bearing the marks, not of
gradual growth, but of full development, point to the colonisation of the
island by a highly-cultured race, such as were the ancient people of
_Iran_ (Persia). The round towers, for instance, could not well have been
the work of the Phœnicians, who were a maritime and mercantile race, by no
means prone to arts and letters, and in none of whose admitted settlements
is any trace of similar buildings to be found. Neither the Firbolgs (or
Celtic inhabitants of Ireland), nor the Fomorians, nor the Scythians,
Scoto-Milesians, nor Danish invaders, were at all given to the refinements
of civilisation, and simply regarded the construction of permanent
buildings as unworthy of a race of warriors. Everything, in fact, goes to
show that the Tuath-de-danaan settlers alone could have erected these
towers, introduced the Boreadan ceremonial, and given to the country of
their adoption a name taken from that of their native land. With the
Scythian conquest, it became, of course, inevitable that this name (_Irin_
or _Eirin_) should be changed into _Scuitte_ or _Scotia_ (the land of the
_Scythians_), and that there should have been a partial exodus of the
vanquished Tuath-de-danaans--some of whom, settling in what is now
Scotland, gave it the name of _Iran_ or _Eran_ (which survives in _Erne_
or _Erse_), which was afterwards changed into _Scoitte_ or _Scotia_, out
of compliment to the Scythian rulers of the adjacent island, with whom its
Pictish inhabitants had formed alliance.
CHAPTER XXIX
(PP. 432-444)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account