By the above proposal I must not be understood as _admitting_ that my _original_ essay “was not _sufficiently_ conclusive”; but as I had more arguments still in reserve, I wanted to elicit from the Academy the admission that it was _truth_ they sought after. After waiting, however, more than three weeks, and getting no reply, I forwarded some other proofs, accompanied by a letter, of which the following was the conclusion, viz.:-- (No. 2.) “These are but _items_ in the great body of discoveries which this intercalary work will exhibit. In truth, I may without vanity assert that the whole _ancient history of Ireland_, etc., is therein rectified and elucidated--which it never was before. Am I, therefore, presumptuous in appealing to the Royal Irish Academy--the heads of Irish literature and the avowed patrons of its development--for the reward of my labours? “I shall with confidence rely upon their _justice_.--I have the honour to be, with sincere regard, etc. “HENRY O’BRIEN. “To the Rev. Dr. J. H. Singer, “_Secretary to the Academy_.” (No. 3.) “ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY HOUSE, “_April 16, 1833_. “SIR,--Your _improved_ essay and letter were yesterday laid before Council, and as Dr Singer is at present confined with the gout, it devolves on me to communicate to you the following extract from the minutes:-- “‘Resolved, that the Secretary be directed to reply to Mr. O’Brien, and to state that any alteration or revocation of their award cannot be made, _whatever may be the merits_ of any additional matter supplied to them after the day appointed by advertisement; but if Mr. O’Brien be willing that the new matter be printed along with the original Essay, the Council will have the same perused, in order to ascertain the expediency of so enlarging their publication.’--By order. “RICH. ROW, _Clerk to the Academy_. “To H. O’Brien, Esq.” (No. 4.) “LONDON, _April 18, 1833_.