American essays -- 20th century; Literature -- History and criticism
Into this desiccating atmosphere Mark Twain came just when its best
spiritual oxygen had all been pumped out. Too insecure in his own
standards not to defer to those of the established East, he took the
standards of the first persons under whose influence he fell. There
was his wife, who had been brought up in Elmira, in “up-state” New
York, where a “stagnant, fresh water aristocracy, one and seven-eighths
or two and a quarter generations deep, densely provincial, resting
on a basis of angular sectarianism, eviscerated politics, and raw
money, ruled the roost, imposing upon all the rest of society its
own type, forcing all to submit to it or to imitate it.” Mark Twain
submitted and imitated, with the result that he, who had in himself
the makings of a _sans-culotte_, became in most outward ways a pillar
of society, and he who was built to be a Rabelais of loud, large,
exuberant satire, became instead a writer quite safe (with a few
furtively obscene exceptions, such as “1601”) for the domestic fireside
and the evening lamp. And not only his wife was to blame. There was
William Dean Howells, whom Boston, lacking any such energetic blood
of its own in those decaying days, had had to import from Ohio, but
who without serious struggle accepted the spinsterly principles of
Boston, decided that “the more smiling aspects of life are the more
American,” and, as regards Mark Twain, tamed him with the doctrines
of a timid gentility and a surface realism. Once handcuffed between
these two good and gentle captors, Mark Twain was lost. Instead of
satirizing the United States as he was born to do, he satirized
medieval France and England and generally the great, deep past of
Europe, thereby actually multiplying the self-congratulations of which
his countrymen had already too much the habit. Instead of telling the
truth about contemporary life, which he had the eyes to see, he kept
a thousand silences on matters about which he could not say what he
saw and thought without hurting the feelings of his friends—that is,
the privileged class. Instead of building some precious edifice of
beauty that might dare the sun and shake the very spheres, as great
beauty does, he was content to laugh at beauty or at least at those
exceptional creatures who follow it into paths that to duller men seem
vague or ridiculous. Poor Mark Twain, Mr. Brooks in effect concludes,
he was born to be a master and creator, but he died having never
been anything but the victim of his epoch—the “saddest, most ironical
figure,” the playboy of the Western World.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account