American essays -- 20th century; Literature -- History and criticism
Something more than the fact that the publishers have made Edward
Waldo Emerson’s _The Early Years of the Saturday Club_ somewhat in
the likeness of _The Education of Henry Adams_ keeps reminding one of
that other book, though Adams, nipping critic of orthodox Boston, is
nowhere mentioned. The horribly dreary Boston world of Adams’s second
chapter assuredly did not exist for the Saturday men, a body so festive
that when Agassiz returned from Brazil in the summer of 1866, Lowell,
Holmes, Fields, and the rest “joined hands, made a ring, and danced
around him like a lot of boys, while Mr. Emerson stood apart, his face
radiant.” In fact, no more genial chronicle of New England in negligee
has been written. The Pundits were a long way from the Frog Pond
when the Adirondack Club, most of its members then or later members
of the Saturday Club as well, went to its first camp in 1858. Holmes
would not leave the daily felicities of the Hub, and Longfellow, also
no frontiersman, gave as excuse for staying at home the report that
Emerson was taking a gun, though in fact Emerson never touched man or
beast with a bullet. But Emerson was enchanted with the transcendental
paradise which he found in the wilderness; and Lowell, younger and
robuster, climbed a pine tree over fourteen feet in girth and sixty
feet to the lowest branch.
Still, the Club dined more than it picnicked. While it unfortunately
had no systematic Boswell, not a few of its good sayings are brought
together in the record, particularly as taken down by Emerson in his
omnivorous journal. There is Tom Appleton’s praise of horse-chestnuts:
“I have carried this one in my pocket these ten years, and in all
that time have had no touch of rheumatism. Indeed, its action is
retrospective, for I never had rheumatism before.” And the same wit
commented as follows upon a sad defect in the economy of nature:
“Canvasback ducks eat the wild celery; and the common black duck, if
it ate the wild celery, is just as good, only, damn ’em, they won’t
eat it.” Once William Morris Hunt was asked if he would like to see
a Japanese vase or cup which Norton had just received. “Like to see
it?” Hunt exclaimed. “By God, it’s one of those damned ultimate
things.” Felton, kept from a meeting by illness, “horizontally but ever
cordially” wrote that he was “living on a pleasant variety of porridge
and paregoric.” Holmes, referring to the immense vitality of Agassiz,
said: “I cannot help thinking what a feast the cannibals would have
if they boiled him.” Judge Hoar declared he valued the Book of Common
Prayer for its special recognition of his native town: “O God who art
the Author of good and the lover of Concord.” Holmes, no beauty,
declared: “I have always considered my face a convenience rather than
an ornament.” Longfellow, vexed at seeing plover on the table in
May, 1858, “proclaimed aloud my disgust at seeing the game laws thus
violated. If anybody wants to break a law, let him break the Fugitive
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account