The Royal Exchange : $b a note on the occasion of the bicentenary of the Royal Exchange AssuranceMason, A. E. W. (Alfred Edward Woodley)
History
The Royal Exchange : $b a note on the occasion of the bicentenary of the Royal Exchange Assurance
Mason, A. E. W. (Alfred Edward Woodley)
Royal Exchange (London, England) -- History; Royal Exchange Assurance (Firm) -- History
We are not to picture Sir Thomas as unduly elated; the building was,
to be sure, a great thing in the history of London and a definite help
to the commerce of England. It had been mooted before. His father,
Sir Richard Gresham, Master of the Mercers’ Company and Lord Mayor of
London, for many years had advocated the erection of an Exchange in
London and to him credit for the original conception must be given.
Henry the Eighth in the twenty-sixth year of his reign sent his letters
to the City for the making of a new Burse at Leadenhall, but by a show
of hands the City had refused it, preferring that the merchants should
still meet to conduct their business on the cobble stones of Lombard
Street. Now, however, the Exchange was a fact. It stood facing Cornhill
with the great gilt Grasshopper of Sir Thomas Gresham’s crest perched
on the top of its tall tower. But the Exchange was not the end of Sir
Thomas Gresham’s policy--it was no more than the half-way house on
the road of his high ambitions. It was to be one of the means by which
Englishmen were to become masters in their own City and the pernicious
rule of the Lombardy men, and above all of the Stillyard was to be
destroyed.
The Stillyard was, to the modern understanding, one of the strangest
institutions which the world has ever seen. It took its origin from
the debts of the early English kings and the money with which the
German traders from the Baltic, the Easterlings as they were called,
were able to provide them. These Easterlings or Emperor’s men--the
latter designation in time came to supersede the earlier--were the
representatives in England of the famous Hanseatic League, and for the
greater part of the five centuries which followed upon the reign of
Edward the Confessor, they used England’s inability to finance her wars
on the Continent, and her Crusades in the East, to fix a stranglehold
upon British Commerce. They were established in rights and privileges
which no English shared with them; they paid fixed taxes; they held
a monopoly of the export of the most valuable raw materials, such
as wool, and of the import of the most valuable finished products.
The early history of this country gives many a significant little
proof of the great power which they held. They were responsible for
the upkeep of Bishopsgate, except the hinges, for which the Bishop
of London was responsible, and on account of this obligation they
were relieved from the tax called “Murage,” which was devoted to the
upkeep of the City walls. In 1303, Edward the First, when replying to
a Petition, presented by the Mayor, Aldermen and Commoners of the City
of London, asking that the Lombards might be forbidden from dwelling
in the City, acting as brokers, or buying and selling by retail,
stated, that if the Citizens would put the City under good government,
no foreigner should be allowed so to dwell or act in the City or its
Liberties, save and except the merchants of the Hanseatic towns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account