The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First ProfessorsJones, Bence
History
The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First Professors
Jones, Bence
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829; Royal Institution of Great Britain; Rumford, Benjamin, Graf von, 1753-1814; Young, Thomas, 1773-1829
We may venture to affirm that out of every hundred of fancied
improvements in arts or in machines ninety at least, if not
ninety-nine, are either old or useless; the object of our
researches is to enable ourselves to distinguish and to adopt the
hundredth. But, while we prune the luxuriant shoots of youthful
invention, we must remember to perform our task with leniency,
and to show that we wish only to give additional vigour to the
healthful branches, and not to extirpate the parent plant.
He spoke of the repository of models as being a supplementary room for
apparatus exhibited and described in the lectures, and ‘where a few
other articles may perhaps deserve admission.’ He mentioned the library
and the Journals as free from commercial shackles, but made no mention
of the workshops nor of the education of artisans.
When all the advantages which may reasonably be expected from this
Institution shall be fully understood and impartially considered,
it is to be hoped that few persons of liberal minds will be
indifferent to its success or unwilling to contribute to it and to
participate in it.
To that regulation which forbids the introduction of any
discussions connected with the learned professions I shall always
most willingly submit and most punctually attend. It requires the
study of a considerable portion of a man’s life to qualify him
to be of use to mankind in any of them, and nothing can be more
pernicious to individuals or to society than the attempting to
proceed practically upon an imperfect conception of a few first
principles only. In physic the wisest can do but little, and the
ignorant can only do worse than nothing; and anxiously as we are
disposed to seek whatever relief the learned and experienced may be
able to afford us, so cautiously ought we to avoid the mischievous
interference of the half-studied empiric. In politics and in
religion we need but to look back on the history of kingdoms and
republics, in order to be aware of the mischiefs which ensue when
fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
With regard to his prospectus and lectures he said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account