The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First ProfessorsJones, Bence
History
The Royal Institution: Its Founder and First Professors
Jones, Bence
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829; Royal Institution of Great Britain; Rumford, Benjamin, Graf von, 1753-1814; Young, Thomas, 1773-1829
Such is the beautiful theory of Fresnel and Young, for we must not,
in our regard for one great name, forget the justice which is
due to the other; and to separate them, and to assign to each his
share, would be as impracticable as invidious, so intimately are
they blended together throughout every part of this system--early,
acute, and pregnant suggestion characterising the one, and maturity
of thought, fulness of systematic development, and decisive
experimental illustration equally distinguishing the other.
During the last five years of Dr. Young’s life, when he was between
fifty-one and fifty-six years old, he ceased to be a practising
physician, and occupied himself with science and literature only.
In 1827, at the anniversary of the Royal Society, after the resignation
of the presidency by Sir Humphry Davy, the claims of Dr. Young were too
strong to be altogether neglected.
Writing to his sister he says:
I find there has been pretty general conversation about making
me President of the Royal Society, and I really think if I were
foolish enough to wish for the office, I am at this _moment_
popular enough to obtain it; but you well know that nothing is
further from my wishes.
Davies Gilbert was chosen. ‘I told him,’ says Young, ‘that he had not
quite enough of the devil in him, that Sir Joseph Banks should have
left his _eyebrows_ to go with his cocked hat, if he had left the
Society nothing else.’
In the summer of 1828 he visited Paris for the last time on his way to
Geneva. He was then one of the eight foreign associates of the Academy.
To Mr. Gurney he wrote:
My principal object was Champollion, and with him I have been
completely successful as far as I wanted his _assistance_, for, to
say the truth, our conferences have not been very gratifying to my
_vanity_. He has done so much more and so much better than I had
any reason to believe he would or could have done, and, as he feels
his own importance more, he feels less occasion to be tenacious of
any trifling claims which may justly be denied him, and in this
spirit he has borne my criticisms with perfect good humour, though
Arago has charged me with some degree of undue severity, and wanted
to pass the matter over as not having been published as mine; but
to this I could not consent: and, supposing that Champollion might
have been unacquainted with the remarks, I thought it a matter of
conscience to carry them to him this morning, before I allowed him
to continue his profuse liberality in furnishing me with more than
I want.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account