The Royal Mail: Its Curiosities and RomanceHyde, James Wilson
History
The Royal Mail: Its Curiosities and Romance
Hyde, James Wilson
Postal service -- Great Britain
"You will excuse me of the liberty which I take to write to you, but as
I know nobody in your town, I have not found an other way for find
relations with some body honourable. I will ask you if you can procure
me a place in the English Colonies or plantations as teacher in an
institution or tutor in a good family. I am old of 22 years. I have gone
a good course of study in the college and gymnasium in ----, and I have
held during a 1-1/2 year in the pensionnat ---- an place as teacher of
French language and Mathematics. I can give you some good Certificates;
I speak French, German, and a little English. I should wish for be
entirely defrayed of the charges of lodging, nourishment, &c., to have a
good salary and the voyage paid. These are my conditions; perhaps will
you found something for satisfy them. I will give you a commission
proportionably to the importance of the place. I hope Sir a favorible
answer, and it is in this expectation that I am," &c.
The next letter is of another kind, and is not a bad effort for a
schoolboy:--
"Not having received the live bullfinch mentioned by you as having
arrived at the Returned-letter office two days ago, having been posted
as a letter contrary to the regulations of the postal system, I now
write to ask you to have the bird fed and forwarded at once to ----; and
to apply for all fines and expenses to ----. If this is not done and I
do not receive the bird before the end of the week, I shall write to the
Postmaster-General, who is a very intimate friend of my father's, and
ask him to see that measures are taken against you for neglect. This is
not an idle threat, so you will oblige by following the above
instructions."
In the rules laid down by the Post-office for the guidance of its
officers and the information of the public, an endeavour is made to use
plain language; but in any case of doubtful meaning, the Post-office,
having framed the rules, claims the right of interpreting them. At one
time an element in the definition of a newspaper, under the newspaper
post, was that it should consist of a sheet or sheets _unstitched_. A
newspaper having been taxed a penny, owing to the sheets being tied
together with thread, the person who sent the newspaper made the
following sharp remonstrance:--
"SIR,--I had hoped that the utterly indefensible regulation in reference
to which I send a wrapper had been silently abolished. The public is
quite unable to understand why stitching is made the _differentia_ of a
newspaper and a pamphlet, and I can hardly suppose that the occasional
penalty of 1d. can be the motive. If in the printed regulations you
would assign a sufficient motive, no one would of course object. Allow
me to ask, if a piece of string is passed through two holes and the ends
not tied in a knot, if that is considered stitching? According to
Johnson's definition of stitching my newspaper was not stitched, but
tied, _for I used no needle_."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account