Although to know them may have been to understand their worth, I find
one early writer, Marshall McDonald Douglass, in his _North
America_, 1740, who does not give the tribe much credit.
“Alewives,” he says, “by some of the country people are called
Herrings. They are of the Herring tribe but much larger than the true
Herring. They are a very mean, dry and insipid fish. Some of them are
cured in the manner of white Herrings and sent to the sugar islands for
the slaves, but because of their bad quality they are not in request:
in some places they are used to manure the land. They are very plenty,
and come up the rivers and brooks into ponds in the spring.” None the
less, they used to be smoked or pickled in brine and shipped out in
barrels to the West Indies, and whether or not the quality was bad the
demand was enough to make the trade in them into one of great volume,
part in fact of the famous swap for molasses, later turned into New
England rum, which was so important in our early history.
Before I try to defend these fish against any further imputations, I
should explain their name. “Herrin’” is the name and pronunciation on
Cape Cod. I don’t call them alewives just to defy such Cape Codders
as might be fussy about it, but to differentiate them from their more
famous cousins the sea herring, which spawn in salt water. Cape Cod
has its alewives committees, and it may be that the fish were called
alewives here before they were called herrin’.
You can still read statements to the effect that the original name
“alewife” is a corruption of the Indian word “aloofe,” which meant bony
fish. In 1871 a gentleman named J. Hammond Trumbull tried to scotch
this bit of etymology by pointing out--in a government publication
on Sea Fisheries, that the Narragansett and Massachusetts Indians
called the alewife and herring “Aumsu-og,” as had been noted by Roger
Williams. In any case, whichever Indianism we choose, it seems more
likely that the name stemmed from English dialect. “Allizes,” not at
all like aloofe, was one of the names applied to it in company with the
allice shad. To quote Mr. Trumbull again: “The modern English ‘allis’
was in old French and old English ‘alouze’ or ‘aloose,’ nearer than
the modern form of the name to the Latin ‘alausa.’” The latest in this
chain of spellings is of course _Alosa_, the scientific handle now
applied to the shad, and in some texts to the alewife.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account