Are there no individuals among them? It is perhaps no term to apply
with so manifestly united a company. In any case we are deceived if we
try to translate ourselves, our ability to choose, our eyes for pattern
and variation, into an animal that can see us at best as an occasional,
strange, blurred image appearing above the bank, and to whom everything
but the water world is unknown. In a sense we know too little, and so
do they, to discuss the matter.
Yet anyone, with a slipping, plunging alewife in his hands, knows it in
some degree for its uniqueness. This green-backed, silver-sided water
animal, smooth, supple, and muscular, with a sail-like fin on its back
is definite enough. Its body is convex-sided, coming to a thin edge
at the belly, shaped like shellfish, seeds, or Indian artifacts. From
its undershot jaw to its tail, it is clearly a tough fish, and in our
experience an adaptable one that knows its way.
This is the “sawbelly” all right. You can very easily feel the
serrations, or little teeth, with your fingers--it is one good way of
telling alewives from sea herring in the dark. But the name “big-eyed”
is perhaps most dramatically true of the alewife. Its black, round,
shining eyes are very prominent in proportion to its small head and
small mouth. They are large black disks like certain water-worn rocks,
or they are great bubbles coming up from a dark depth. I fancied,
seeing a tiny image of myself in the alewife’s eye, that I was
reflected in a deep, impenetrable well.
It is known that a fish’s eye is somewhat like ours in that it has
a lens, an iris, a cornea, retina, and optic nerve; but that it is
designed to see under water, which ours is not. In J. H. Norman’s
_History of Fishes_, he writes: “The eye, as is well known,
acts after the manner of a photographic camera, the two essential parts
being the screen or retina at the back, and the lens at the front,
which projects an image of the outside world on the screen. The lens
of a land vertebrate is somewhat flat and convex on both sides, but in
the fish it is a globular body, the extreme convexity being a necessity
under water because the substance of the lens is not very much denser
than the fluid medium in which the fish lives. The space between lens
and retina is filled with a transparent jelly-like substance, the
vitreous humor. The transparent outer wall of the eye, the cornea, is
somewhat flatter in fishes, and the space between this and the lens
is filled by the watery, aqueous humor. In land vertebrates the iris
of the eye is capable of great contraction, and, acting like the
diaphragm of a camera, regulates the amount of light allowed to enter
the eye. In fishes it generally surrounds a rounded pupil, and has
comparatively little power of contraction.”
I should add that an alewife’s eye is somewhat fixed, and not capable
of much movement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account