There is an explanation about salmon fry which has them gradually going
seaward in order to escape the brighter light in the shallow fresh
waters; but is there anything in the constitution of an alewife that
is not accustomed to sunlit waters? They do not escape them so much
as seek them, because of their warmer temperature. Aside from that,
I would think, from my own observation, and the comments of others,
that they have no preference between the dark and light along their
way--they run through both--but do not like a sudden change. For
example, they waited all one morning before coming out of the shaded
waters under Stony Brook Road to go into the brightness of the seining
pool, only moving when a shadow fell across it that was cast by the old
mill.
If the adults swim toward the coast in the spring because of some
change in their make-up consonant with changes in the waters where they
swim, is there also some change in food and temperature which makes
the young start to leave fresh water at a particular time? The little
alewives are creatures of such sensitivity to their medium, to its
changes, and to what they eat, that a factor in the timing of their
migration might be some internal discomfort, or so it was suggested
to me. To begin to find out, a scientist would have to follow all the
stages of a little alewife’s birth and growth, tracing where it goes,
what it eats, and what the temperature, depth, and density of the
water is along the way. He would also have to do this for every age
group that leaves the three ponds from July through October, analyzed
pond by pond, since conditions differ in each one. During this period
the little fish leave at all stages in the seasonal development of
the ponds, while not all of one age group seem to go with the others.
Many appear to stay in the ponds for several months. So attempting
consistency with such findings might result in more indigestion for the
investigator than the fish themselves.
From the outward evidence all I can say is that these little ones do
not start schooling to move out of the ponds until they are over an
inch in length. I have seen them, still not much more than pin size,
circling a few hundred yards above the outlet, but neither swimming
with the flow nor letting themselves be drifted on. Logically then, the
point at which they are stimulated to leave must coincide with growth,
the rate of which depends on food and temperature in the ponds.
Warm-water ponds are more favorable to growth than cold-water ponds.
They turn out better fish, larger and healthier. By the same token a
cold spring and summer will result in a poorer crop of alewives. They
will probably be hatched later. The colder pond waters will bring
down the “plankton bloom,” in other words less food for the fish. As
a result, young alewives going to salt water that year will be
smaller, weaker, more subject to disease, and less able to escape their
enemies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account