Country life -- England; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
Besides the general discontent and turn-out just noticed, which Mrs.
Grey attributes to the waywardness of human nature, we must introduce
these facts. The morals of these districts have been highly extolled,
and both Mr. and Mrs. Grey strongly reiterate the eulogium. Mrs. Grey
does not recollect _two_ instances of intoxication amongst the hinds in
her life; we saw many one day, as already stated. In the Fourth Annual
Report of the Poor Law Commissioners, even while advocating “the hinding
system,” we find these singular paragraphs: “Whatever general merits may
or may not otherwise have distinguished Northumberland and Durham from
more pauperized districts, these counties must not lay claim to
superiority in reference to bastardy, for in no part of England was
bastardy more prevalent than in portions of this district, and in none
was the practice of relief to the mother more pertinaciously upheld. The
Newcastle parishes of All Saints’ and St. Andrews, together with the
parishes of Sunderland and Berwick, _are the only places we can call to
mind_ where a weekly allowance for every legitimate child was not a
matter of course.
“The difficulties of inducing children in competent circumstances to
contribute to the support of their aged parents (whose maintenance the
parish had hitherto taken off their hands), were quite as great, if not
relatively greater, considering the wages of labour, in the north as in
the south.”
So much for morals; now for the Arcadian cottages. The Newcastle Courant
of November 23d, 1838, stated that “Thomas Dodds, Esq., surgeon, read a
very valuable paper on ‘Improvement in Cottage Architecture, and the
domestic comfort of the peasantry of North Northumberland.’ Mr. Dodds’
long personal observation, arising from his medical practice,” it is
stated, “peculiarly qualified him for the discussion of this important
and interesting subject,” and Mr. Dodds very summarily and pithily
characterized these abodes as “a disgrace to Northumberland.” He
contrasted them with “the splendid edifices, commemorative columns, and
magnificent streets, which the people of Northumberland are raising.” He
said, “The _miserable tenements of numbers of this class_ are less
carefully constructed than the stables of their horses, formed, as they
are, _in a majority of cases, of only one apartment_, open to the roof,
with earthen floor, and four-paned windows that dim the light of day, a
part of which is often occupied by the cow; and where the decencies of
life cannot be observed, there being no separate apartments for the
females of the family, one of whom is often a stranger in the capacity
of a servant to work ‘the bondage.’” He represented them equally
detrimental to health as to comfort and morals; and gave many instances
from personal observation, especially a case at that moment of a family
of eight persons, near Alnwick, all lying ill of typhus fever in their
one room with the corpse of one of them laid out in the midst of them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account