The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and IssuesAsakawa, Kan'ichi
History
The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and Issues
Asakawa, Kan'ichi
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905 -- Causes
The Russia-China trade began more than 250 years ago. Before 1860, it
was carried wholly on land, and its balance was nearly even. Since
1860, when sea trade from Odessa was opened, the progress of this
trade has been slower than the general foreign trade of China, and its
balance has been heavily against Russia (6,702,000 against 45,945,000
rubles in 1900). More than half of the Russian imports into China
consists of cotton fabrics, and over 80 per cent. of the exports from
China to Russia are teas. Russia’s share in the entire foreign trade
of China has also fallen from 4.6 per cent. in 1899 to 4.4 per cent.
in 1900, 2.6 per cent. in 1901, and 2.3 per cent. in 1902, as compared
with the growing share of the trade by Japan amounting to 14.2 per
cent., 15.9 per cent., 15.7 per cent., and 18.4 per cent., in those
respective years. Of the Russian share of 2.6 per cent. in 1901,
Russian Manchuria occupied only 0.6 per cent. See the _Tsūshō Isan_,
July 8, 1903, pp. 1–4; T. Yoshida’s _Shina Bōyeki Jijō_ (Trade
Conditions in China), Tokio, 1902, pp. 128–129, etc. For the gold
values of the figures up to 1903, see the British _D. and C. Reports_,
annual series, No. 3280.
Footnote 70:
From Russian official figures quoted in the _Tsūshō Isan_, November
25, 1903.
Footnote 71:
The reader is recommended to the reports of the United States Consul
Miller at Niu-chwang, particularly those which appeared in the daily
_Consular Reports_ for January 21 and 24, and February 5, 1904 (Nos.
1856, 1858, and 1869). Reference should also be made to the ex-British
Consul at Niu-chwang, Alexander Hosie’s _Manchuria_, London, 1901 (new
edition, New York, 1904).
The resources of Eastern Manchuria are well described in the _Tsūshō
Isan_, October 13, 1903, and those of Northern Manchuria in the
_Shiberiya oyobi Manshū_, Tokio, 1904, compiled by the Foreign Office
of Japan, pp. 427–485.
Footnote 72:
The present population of Manchuria is differently estimated between
the limits of 6.5 and 15 millions. Probably there are more than 10
millions. Immigration was said to have been progressing rapidly under
the Chinese rule.
It is noteworthy that Siberia, with a larger area than Manchuria,
contains only about 8,000,000 inhabitants. The productive capacity of
the Manchurian population must be measured, however, not only by their
larger numbers, but also by their far superior economic training.
Footnote 73:
The _Tsūshō Isan_ for June 23, 1903, pp. 34–35. Pood = 36.112 lbs.;
ruble = 51.5 cents.
Footnote 74:
Under this and other differential measures the commercial importance
of Vladivostok is said to be fast passing away. Local merchants made a
strong plea of their case before M. Witte when he traveled in the East
in 1902, but on his return he reported to the Czar that the interests
of the Empire demanded a large sacrifice at Vladivostok for the sake
of Dalny.
Footnote 75:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account