The Sanitary Evolution of LondonJephson, Henry (Henry Lorenzo)
History
The Sanitary Evolution of London
Jephson, Henry (Henry Lorenzo)
Public health -- England -- London
"It is a question whether the greatness of countries will not in future
to a very large extent depend upon the standard of public health."
One of the very best and most experienced of the men who held the
responsible office of Medical Officer of Health during the last half
century--Dr. Bateson, the Medical Officer of Health for St. George in
Southwark--in his reports often dwelt upon this aspect of the subject:--
"The only true and lasting foundation upon which the glory and safety
of a nation can be built must be upon the cultivation of the moral and
physical powers belonging to man."
"... The quality of a race is of far more importance than the quantity."
"Health to the majority of the population is their only wealth; without
it they become pauperised."
"The welfare and safety of this country need a healthy, stalwart race
of men--men who can labour and endure."
And in his last report (1878), after twenty years' service as Medical
Officer of Health, he quoted the Prime Minister (Lord Beaconsfield) as
saying:--
"The health of a people was really the foundation upon which all their
happiness and all their powers as a state depended. If the population
of a country was stationary, or that it yearly diminished, or that
whilst it diminished it diminished also in stature and strength, then
that country was ultimately doomed."
"Nothing," said Dr. Bateson, "could be more solemn and emphatic."
"For the success and permanence of national existence a high standard
of health is absolutely necessary. To maintain in its integrity the
vast power which England now wields, and to retain the high position
which she now holds will depend upon the nation's health."
Before considerations such as these, how lamentable the blindness of
those who could not see that even a measurable expenditure in health
matters would have been productive of immeasurable benefits; how
reprehensible the conduct of those who refused to administer laws
which it was their duty to administer, and the administration of which
would have been of inestimable value to their fellow citizens; and how
disastrous their studied inaction to the great metropolis, and through
it, to the nation itself.
FOOTNOTES:
[117] Select Committee on Metropolitan Buildings and Management Bill,
1874. P.P., vol. x.
[118] Evidence of G. Vulliamy, Select Committee, 1874.
Superintending-Architect to that Board.
[119] See Report of Select Committee, &c., 1874, Q. 23,445.
[120] Select Committee of 1867.
[121] P.P., 1868-9, vol. xxxiii.
[122] 32 and 33 Vic. cap. 70.
[123] See P.P. 1863, vol. xxv. Report by Tremenheere on Bakehouses, p.
113.
[124] Adulteration of Food and Drink and Drugs Act, 1872, 35 and 36
Vic. cap. 74.
[125] P.P. 1874, vol. vi.
[126] Issued on the 17th of September, 1872, and renewed the 25th of
March, 1873.
[127] Final Report of the School Board for London, 1870-1904.
[128] See Select Committee on Noxious Businesses, 1873. P.P., vol. x.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account