The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The Nāgānanda reveals Harṣa in a new light in the last two Acts. His
liking for the marvellous is exhibited indeed in the last Acts of both
the Nāṭikās in accord with the theory, but it has a far wider scope in
the Nāgānanda, where the supernatural freely appears, and, though the
drama be Buddhist in inspiration, Gaurī is introduced to solve the
difficulty of restoring Jīmūtavāhana. Harṣa here rises to the task of
depicting the emotions of self-sacrifice, charity, magnanimity, and
resolution in the face of death; Jīmūtavāhana, however bizarre his
setting, is one of the ideals of Buddhism, a man seized with the
conviction that to sacrifice oneself for others is the highest duty.
Çan̄khacūḍa and his mother too appear as noble in character, far
superior to the savage Garuḍa. There is, it must be admitted, a decided
lack of harmony between the two distinct parts of the drama, but the
total effect is far from unsuccessful. Perhaps as a counterpoise to the
seriousness of the last part, Harṣa has introduced effective comedy in
Act III. The Vidūṣaka, Ātreya, is hideous and stupid; as he lies
sleeping, covered by a mantle to protect him from the bees, the Viṭa,
Çekharaka, sees him, mistakes him for his inamorata, embraces him and
fondles him. Navamālikā enters, and, indignant, the Viṭa makes the
Vidūṣaka, though a Brahmin, bow before her and drink alcohol. A little
later Navamālikā makes fun of him before the newly married couple by
painting his face with Tamūla juice.
Harṣa is fond of descriptions in the approved manner; the evening,
midday, the park, the hermitage, the gardens, the fountain, the
marriage festival, the hour for the bath, the mountain Malaya, the
forest, the palace, are among the ordinary themes beloved in the Kāvya.
In imagination and grace he is certainly inferior to Kālidāsa, but he
possesses the great merit of simplicity of expression and thought; his
Sanskrit is classical, and precise; his use of figures of speech and
thought restrained and in good taste. There is fire in his description
of a battle: [373]
astravyastaçirastraçastrakaṣaṇaiḥ kṛttottamān̄ge muhur
vyūḍhāsṛksariti svanatpraharaṇair gharmodvamadvahnini
āhūyājimukhe sa Kosalādhipatir bhagne pradhāne bale
ekenaiva Rumaṇvatā çaraçatair mattadvipastho hataḥ.
‘Heads were cleft by the blows of swords on helmets sore smitten; blood
flowed in torrents, fire flashed from the ringing strokes; when his
main host had been broken, Rumaṇvant challenged in the forefront of the
battle the lord of Kosala, who rode on a maddened elephant, and alone
slew him with a hundred arrows.’ The matching of the sound to the sense
is admirable, while a delicate perception is evinced in the line
describing the king’s success in soothing the wounded queen: [374]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account